Evaluation of the safety of C-spine clearance by paramedics: design and methodology
Open Access
- 1 February 2011
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 11 (1), 1
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-227x-11-1
Abstract
Canadian Emergency Medical Services annually transport 1.3 million patients with potential neck injuries to local emergency departments. Less than 1% of those patients have a c-spine fracture and even less (0.5%) have a spinal cord injury. Most injuries occur before the arrival of paramedics, not during transport to the hospital, yet most patients are transported in ambulances immobilized. They stay fully immobilized until a bed is available, or until physician assessment and/or X-rays are complete. The prolonged immobilization is often unnecessary and adds to the burden of already overtaxed emergency medical services systems and crowded emergency departments. The goal of this study is to evaluate the safety and potential impact of an active strategy that allows paramedics to assess very low-risk trauma patients using a validated clinical decision rule, the Canadian C-Spine Rule, in order to determine the need for immobilization during transport to the emergency department. This cohort study will be conducted in Ottawa, Canada with one emergency medical service. Paramedics with this service participated in an earlier validation study of the Canadian C-Spine Rule. Three thousand consecutive, alert, stable adult trauma patients with a potential c-spine injury will be enrolled in the study and evaluated using the Canadian C-Spine Rule to determine the need for immobilization. The outcomes that will be assessed include measures of safety (numbers of missed fractures and serious adverse outcomes), measures of clinical impact (proportion of patients transported without immobilization, key time intervals) and performance of the Rule. Approximately 40% of all very low-risk trauma patients could be transported safely, without c-spine immobilization, if paramedics were empowered to make clinical decisions using the Canadian C-Spine Rule. This safety study is an essential step before allowing all paramedics across Canada to selectively immobilize trauma victims before transport. Once safety and potential impact are established, we intend to implement a multi-centre study to study actual impact. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01188447Keywords
This publication has 75 references indexed in Scilit:
- Multicentre prospective validation of use of the Canadian C-Spine Rule by triage nurses in the emergency departmentCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2010
- Prospective Performance Assessment of an Out-of-Hospital Protocol for Selective Spine Immobilization Using Clinical Spine Clearance CriteriaAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2005
- Why Don't Physicians Follow Clinical Practice Guidelines?JAMA, 1999
- Pain and Tissue-Interface Pressures During Spine-Board ImmobilizationAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1995
- Intracranial Hemorrhage as a Predictor of Occult Cervical-Spine FractureAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1994
- The effect of spinal immobilization on healthy volunteersAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1994
- Head, facial, and clavicular trauma as a predictor of cervical-spine injuryAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1992
- Effect of spinal immobilization devices on pulmonary function in the healthy, nonsmoking manAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1988
- Post-traumatic neck pain: A prospective and follow-up studyAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1988
- High-yield roentgenographic criteria for cervical spine injuriesAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1987