Psychological aspects of genetic counseling: IV. The subjective assessment of probability
- 1 October 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in American Journal of Medical Genetics
- Vol. 28 (2), 361-370
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.1320280214
Abstract
Subjects asked to compare mathematically equal statements (or frames) of probability invariably perceived a difference in magnitude between percentages and equivalent proportions. Presented as unrelated to genetic risk, percentages tended to be chosen as having greater magnitude than their equivalent proportions. In justifying their choices subjects used a process of reasoning in which numbers were mentally compared, contrasted, or otherwise manipulated (numerical strategy). When framed as genetic risks, two types of reasoning were used to assess probabilities, the numerical strategy and one involving mental images of persons or parts of persons (person strategy). Subjects who used numerical reasoning tended to perceive percentages as having a greater risk magnitude than equivalent proportions whereas when person reasoning was used proportions with denominators of 10 or less tended to be perceived as having a greater risk magnitude than equivalent percentages. The implications of the findings for genetic counseling are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Decision making: Whether or not to have prenatal diagnosis and abortion for X‐linked conditionsAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, 1985
- Choices, values, and frames.American Psychologist, 1984
- The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of ChoiceScience, 1981
- Impact of genetic counseling: A review of published follow‐up studiesClinical Genetics, 1979
- Genetic counseling — the postcounseling period: I. Parents' perceptions of uncertaintyAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, 1979
- GENETIC CLINICThe Lancet, 1971
- The rationale of genetic counselingThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1968
- The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.Psychological Review, 1956