Case-control studies on venous thromboembolism: bias due to design? A methodological study on venous thromboembolism and steroid hormone use
- 1 March 2002
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Contraception
- Vol. 65 (3), 207-214
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-7824(01)00309-2
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Venous thromboembolism and oral contraceptive use: a methodological study of diagnostic suspicion and referral bias.The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 2000
- Reproductive choices in 2000: the relative safety of current oral contraceptives.Human Reproduction Update, 1999
- Interpretations. The changing scene-an unnecessary pill crisisHuman Reproduction Update, 1999
- The differential risk of oral contraceptives: the impact of full exposure history*Human Reproduction, 1999
- Risk of Venous Thrombosis With Use of Current Low-Dose Oral Contraceptives Is Not Explained by Diagnostic Suspicion and Referral BiasArchives of Internal Medicine, 1999
- The epidemiology of oral contraceptive use: A critical review of the studies on oral contraceptives and the health of young womenAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1998
- Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der EpidemiologieDer Gynäkologe, 1997
- The increased risk of venous thromboembolism and the use of third generation progestagens: Role of bias in observational researchContraception, 1996
- Oral contraceptives and thrombotic diseases: Impact of new epidemiological studiesContraception, 1996
- Third generation oral contraceptives and risk of venous thromboembolic disorders: an international case-control studyBMJ, 1996