A Critique of Milgrom and Roberts' Treatment of Incentives vs. Bureaucratic Controls in the British North American Fur Trade
- 1 January 2002
- journal article
- Published by American Accounting Association in Journal of Management Accounting Research
- Vol. 14 (1), 135-151
- https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar.2002.14.1.135
Abstract
In their 1992 textbook, Economics, Organization and Management, Milgrom and Roberts used 19th century fur trading companies as examples of effective (the incentive-based North West Company) and ineffective (the bureaucratic-based Hudson's Bay Company) organizations. Findings from detailed examinations of both companies' archives suggest that Milgrom and Roberts were not completely accurate in their depictions of the two companies' incentives and bureaucratic controls. In response to complexities of intercontinental trade, both companies used bureaucratic controls for coordination as well as profit sharing to motivate senior managers. More generally, the findings raise questions about Milgrom and Roberts' relatively negative conclusions concerning the effectiveness of bureaucratic controls.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- The development of management accounting at the Hudsonís Bay Company, 1670-1820Accounting History, 2000
- The Provision of Incentives in FirmsJournal of Economic Literature, 1999
- Strategy, Complexity, and Economic RentManagement Science, 1990
- The North American Fur Trade: Bargaining to a Joint Profit Maximum under Incomplete Information, 1804–1821The Journal of Economic History, 1986
- The Birth and death of predatory competition in the north American fur trade: 1810–1821Explorations in Economic History, 1982
- The Causes and Origins of the North American Fur Trade Rivalry: 1804–1810The Journal of Economic History, 1981
- Give Us Good MeasurePublished by University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) ,1978
- Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental UncertaintyAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1972