Opinion formation in evaluating the adjudicative competence and restorability of criminal defendants: a review of 8,000 evaluations
- 24 March 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Behavioral Sciences & the Law
- Vol. 24 (2), 113-132
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.699
Abstract
Evaluations of competence to stand trial (CST) are the most common type of criminal forensic evaluation conducted, and courts tend to defer to clinician opinions regarding a defendant's competence. Thus, it is important to study the ways in which clinicians arrive at opinions regarding adjudicative competence and the data they consider in forming their opinions. We reviewed 8,416 evaluations conducted by forensic evaluators in Virginia over a 12 year period, and examined (a) the clinical, demographic, and criminal characteristics of a defendant as related to opinions regarding competence, predicted restorability, and impairment on “prongs” of the Dusky standard, (b) process and outcome differences in evaluations conducted by psychiatrists versus psychologists and inpatient versus outpatient evaluators, and (c) the consistency of incompetence base rates over a 10 year period. Overall, clinicians opined that 19% of defendants were incompetent and considered 23% of these unlikely to be restored to competence. Not surprisingly, psychotic and organic/intellectual disorders were most strongly associated with findings of incompetence. However, there were some notable differences between evaluations by psychologists versus psychiatrists and between evaluations conducted in inpatient versus outpatient settings. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Competency restoration: an examination of the differences between defendants predicted restorable and not restorable to competency.Law and Human Behavior, 2003
- Predictor variables in competency to stand trial decisions.Law and Human Behavior, 2003
- The relationship between criminal charges, diagnoses, and psycholegal opinions among federal pretrial defendantsBehavioral Sciences & the Law, 2001
- An analysis of competency to stand trial: an integration of case law and clinical knowledgeBehavioral Sciences & the Law, 1998
- Five year research update (1991-1995): evaluations for competence to stand trialBehavioral Sciences & the Law, 1997
- Psychological test use in criminal forensic evaluations.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 1995
- How adequate are Oklahoma's mental health evaluations for determining competency in criminal proceedings? the bench and the bar respondThe Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 1995
- Evaluations of trial competency and mental state at time of offense: Report characteristics.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 1995
- Attorney‐ client decision‐ making in criminal cases: Client competence and participation as perceived by their attorneysBehavioral Sciences & the Law, 1992
- Barring ultimate issue testimony: An "insane" rule?Law and Human Behavior, 1991