Provider Satisfaction With Virtual Specialist Consultations in a Family Medicine Department
- 1 January 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in The Health Care Manager
- Vol. 28 (1), 14-18
- https://doi.org/10.1097/hcm.0b013e318196def8
Abstract
Virtual consultations (VCs) are being ordered by primary care physicians in 1 large multispecialty clinic, replacing face-to-face visits with specialists. Virtual consultations involve electronic communication between physicians, including exchanging medical information. The purpose of this study was to assess provider satisfaction with VCs via e-mail survey. Although approximately 30% of the 56 family medicine providers had not tried the VC system after it had been in place for over a year or said that they often forgot that VCs were an option, most of the providers surveyed (73%) felt that VCs provided good medical care. A majority felt that VCs are a cost-effective and efficient tool for our department (65%). Most specialists (81%) reported that VCs were an efficient use of their time, and 67% said that VCs were less disruptive than contacts by telephone or pager. Only 5% felt that VCs do not provide good medical care. Although several of our primary care providers have been enthusiastic about VCs, others have been reluctant to adopt this innovation. Specialists providing VCs tended to be supportive. This illustrates both the difficulty of incorporating e-health innovations in primary care practice and the potential for increased efficiency.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Email teleconsultations: well formulated clinical referrals reduce the need for clinic consultationJournal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 2006
- Physician Referral RatesMedical Care, 2000
- Why do physicians vary so widely in their referral rates?Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2000
- Resolving the Gatekeeper ConundrumJAMA, 1999
- Physicians' Experiences and Beliefs Regarding Informal ConsultationJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 1998