Prospective use of Ablation Index targets improves clinical outcomes following ablation for atrial fibrillation
- 26 July 2017
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
- Vol. 28 (9), 1037-1047
- https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.13281
Abstract
Late recovery of ablated tissue leading to reconnection of pulmonary veins remains common following radiofrequency catheter ablation for AF. Ablation Index (AI), a novel ablation quality marker, incorporates contact force (CF), time, and power in a weighted formula. We hypothesized that prospective use of our previously published derived AI targets would result in better outcomes when compared to CF-guided ablation. Eighty-nine consecutive drug-refractory AF patients (49% paroxysmal) underwent AI-guided ablation (AI-group). AI targets were 550 for anterior/roof and 400 for posterior/inferior left atrial segments. Procedural and clinical outcomes of these patients were compared to 89 propensity-matched controls who underwent CF-guided ablation (CF-group). All 178 procedures were otherwise similar, and both groups were followed-up for 12 months. The last 25 patients from each group underwent analysis of all VisiTags™ for ablation duration, CF, Force-Time Integral, and impedance drop. First-pass pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was more frequent in AI-group than in CF-group (173 [97%] vs. 149 [84%] circles, P < 0.001), and acute PV reconnection was lower (11 [6%] vs. 24 [13%] circles, P = 0.02). Mean PVI ablation time was similar (AI-group: 42 ± 9 vs. CF-group: 45 ± 14 minutes, P = 0.14). Median impedance drop for AI-group was significantly higher than in CF-group (13.7 [9-19] Ω vs. 8.8 [5.2-13] Ω, P < 0.001). Two major complications occurred in CF-group and none in AI-group. Atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence was significantly lower in AI-group (15 of 89 [17%]) than in CF-group (33 of 89 [37%], P = 0.002). AI-guided ablation is associated with significant improvements in the incidence of acute PV reconnection and atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence rate compared to CF-guided ablation, potentially due to creation of better quality lesions as suggested by greater impedance drop.Keywords
Funding Information
- Biosense Webster
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Contact force and force-time integral in atrial radiofrequency ablation predict transmurality of lesionsEP Europace, 2014
- Improving Safety in Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Prospective Study of the Use of Ultrasound to Guide Vascular AccessJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2014
- Comparison of lesion formation between contact force-guided and non-guided circumferential pulmonary vein isolation: A prospective, randomized studyHeart Rhythm, 2014
- Target Indices for Clinical Ablation in Atrial FibrillationCirculation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 2014
- Catheter-Tissue Contact Force Determines Atrial Electrogram Characteristics Before and Lesion Efficacy After Antral Pulmonary Vein Isolation in HumansJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2013
- Electrical Reconnection After Pulmonary Vein Isolation Is Contingent on Contact Force During Initial TreatmentCirculation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 2013
- 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial designJournal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2012
- The architecture of the left lateral atrial wall: a particular anatomic region with implications for ablation of atrial fibrillationEuropean Heart Journal, 2008
- “Dormant” Pulmonary Vein Conduction Revealed by Adenosine after Ostial Radiofrequency Catheter AblationJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2004
- Impedance Monitoring During Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in HumansPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1992