Should Immigration Status Information Be Included in a Patient's Health Record?
Open Access
- 1 January 2019
- journal article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in The AMA Journal of Ethic
- Vol. 21 (1), E8-16
- https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2019.8
Abstract
The documentation of immigration status in patient records poses a challenge to clinicians. On one hand recording this social determinant of health can facilitate continuity of care and improved communication among clinicians. On the other it might expose patients or their family members to immediate and unforeseen risks such as being stigmatized and discriminated against by nonimmigrant-friendly clinicians or being exposed to immigration enforcement if staff contact immigration officials in violation of patient confidentiality. Patients may raise concerns about the purpose and risks of such documentation alongside fears about potential data sharing and violations of privacy and confidentiality. This commentary explores clinicians’ options for documenting immigration status within the context of ethical legal and historical considerations in caring for stigmatized populations in changing political landscapes.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Making a Case for Sanctuary HospitalsJAMA, 2017
- Evaluating the Impact of Immigration Policies on Health Status Among Undocumented Immigrants: A Systematic ReviewJournal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 2013
- Undocumented Status: Implications for Child Development, Policy, and Ethical ResearchNew Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2013
- Asylum Grant Rates Following Medical Evaluations of Maltreatment among Political Asylum Applicants in the United StatesJournal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 2007
- Laws Restricting Health Insurers' Use of Genetic Information: Impact on Genetic DiscriminationAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2000
- Denial of Care to Illegal Immigrants — Proposition 187 in CaliforniaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995