A Conceptual Content Analysis of 75 Years of Diversity Research in Public Administration
Top Cited Papers
- 2 October 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Review of Public Personnel Administration
- Vol. 38 (2), 248-267
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371x16671368
Abstract
Diversity is an important facet of public administration, thus it is important to take stock and examine how the discipline has evolved in response to questions of representative democracy, social equity, and diversity. This article assesses the state-of-the-field by addressing the following question: How has research on diversity in the field of public administration progressed over time? Specifically, we seek to examine how the focus of diversity has transformed over time and the way the field has responded to half a century of legislation and policies aimed at both promoting equality and embracing difference. We utilize a conceptual content analysis approach to examine articles published on diversity in seven key public administration journals since 1940. The implications of this study are of great importance given that diversity in the workplace is a central issue for modern public management.Keywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- The state of social equity in American public administrationNational Civic Review, 2005
- Who Contributes to Public Administration Review? Examining the Characteristics of Authors Who Submit Manuscripts to the Journal*Public Administration Review, 2005
- Ensuring Employment Equity: Are Federal Diversity Programs Making a Difference?International Journal of Public Administration, 2003
- Outside of the corporate mainstream and excluded from the work community: A study of diversity, job satisfaction and well-beingCommunity, Work & Family, 2002
- Examining Empirical Evidence on Diversity Effects: How Useful Is Diversity Research for Public‐Sector Managers?Public Administration Review, 2000
- Valuing diversity: A tale of two organizationsAcademy of Management Perspectives, 2000
- Interpretation of Kappa and B statistics measures of agreementJournal of Applied Statistics, 1997
- The GAO: An Evolving RolePublic Administration Review, 1978
- Representative Bureaucracy and Policy Preferences: A Study in the Attitudes of Federal ExecutivesPublic Administration Review, 1976
- Measuring Bureaucratic Representation and IntegrationPublic Administration Review, 1973