Narrative review of the in vivo mechanics of the cervical spine after anterior arthrodesis as revealed by dynamic biplane radiography
- 10 September 2015
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Orthopaedic Research
- Vol. 34 (1), 22-30
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.23042
Abstract
Arthrodesis is the standard of care for numerous pathologic conditions of the cervical spine and is performed over 150,000 times annually in the United States. The primary long‐term concern after this surgery is adjacent segment disease (ASD), defined as new clinical symptoms adjacent to a previous fusion. The incidence of adjacent segment disease is approximately 3% per year, meaning that within 10 years of the initial surgery, approximately 25% of cervical arthrodesis patients require a second procedure to address symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration. Despite the high incidence of ASD, until recently, there was little data available to characterize in vivo adjacent segment mechanics during dynamic motion. This manuscript reviews recent advances in our knowledge of adjacent segment mechanics after cervical arthrodesis that have been facilitated by the use of dynamic biplane radiography. The primary observations from these studies are that current in vitro test paradigms often fail to replicate in vivo spine mechanics before and after arthrodesis, that intervertebral mechanics vary among cervical motion segments, and that joint arthrokinematics (i.e. the interactions between adjacent vertebrae) are superior to traditional kinematics measurements for identifying altered adjacent segment mechanics after arthrodesis. Future research challenges are identified, including improving the biofidelity of in vitro tests, determining the natural history of in vivo spine mechanics, conducting prospective longitudinal studies on adjacent segment kinematics and arthrokinematics after single and multiple‐level arthrodesis, and creating subject‐specific computational models to accurately estimate muscle forces and tissue loading in the spine during dynamic activities. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reservedFunding Information
- NIH/NIAMS (R03-AR056265)
This publication has 85 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparisons of surface vs. volumetric model-based registration methods using single-plane vs. bi-plane fluoroscopy in measuring spinal kinematicsMedical Engineering & Physics, 2014
- Update on the evidence for adjacent segment degeneration and diseaseThe Spine Journal, 2013
- Segmental Contribution Toward Total Cervical Range of MotionSpine, 2011
- Adjacent segment degenerative disease: is it due to disease progression or a fusion-associated phenomenon? Comparison between segments adjacent to the fused and non-fused segmentsEuropean Spine Journal, 2011
- Validation of a Noninvasive Technique to Precisely Measure In Vivo Three-Dimensional Cervical Spine MovementSpine, 2011
- Sagittal Segmental Alignment as Predictor of Adjacent-Level Degeneration After a Cloward ProcedureClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2011
- Segmental Percentage Contributions of Cervical Spine During Different Motion Ranges of Flexion and ExtensionJournal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, 2010
- Local and global subaxial cervical spine biomechanics after single-level fusion or cervical arthroplastyEuropean Spine Journal, 2009
- The quantitative measurements of the intervertebral angulation and translation during cervical flexion and extensionEuropean Spine Journal, 2007
- Kyphotic malalignment after anterior cervical fusion is one of the factors promoting the degenerative process in adjacent intervertebral levelsEuropean Spine Journal, 2001