How do People with Different Levels of Activation Self-Manage their Chronic Conditions?
- 1 December 2009
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
- Vol. 2 (4), 257-268
- https://doi.org/10.2165/11313790-000000000-00000
Abstract
Background: People with chronic conditions are better able to self-manage if they are more engaged, informed, and confident. Healthcare providers are increasingly offering support for self-management, and there is interest in improving the efficacy of these efforts by tailoring them to a person’s knowledge, skill, and confidence to self-manage — so-called ‘activation.’ Objective: To explore how people with chronic conditions at different levels of ‘activation’ (as measured by the Patient Activation Measure) understand successful self-management, what barriers to self-management they face, and what strategies they employ to manage their condition and to cope with stress. Methods: Face-to-face semi-structured interviews were conducted with a stratified convenience sample of respondents with at least one chronic condition (n = 27) who were non-faculty staff at the University of Oregon (Eugene, OR, USA). Stratification was performed using the level of patient activation. Interviews took place in February and March 2006 in a private office on the university campus. Results: Those people lower in activation tended to see successful self-management as compliance whereas those at higher activation levels saw it as being in control. People with lower activation levels indicated that lack of knowledge and lack of confidence were barriers for them. Both the high and low activated could be derailed by stress. People with lower activation levels talked about a more limited number of strategies for coping but both the high and low activated had learned strategies from professionals and by trial and error. Conclusions: Some aspects of self-management support may need to be tailored for people at different levels of activation to ensure that differences in their understanding, knowledge, and confidence are addressed. However, there are also likely to be some types of self-management support such as stress-coping strategies and problem-solving skills that are beneficial for all patients with chronic conditions regardless of activation level.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring self-management of patients’ and employees’ health: Further validation of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM) based on its relation to employee characteristicsPatient Education and Counseling, 2009
- Improving the outcomes of disease management by tailoring care to the patient's level of activation.2009
- Do Increases in Patient Activation Result in Improved Self‐Management Behaviors?Health Services Research, 2006
- Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): Conceptualizing and Measuring Activation in Patients and ConsumersHealth Services Research, 2004
- The Efficacy of Tailored InterventionsJournal of Nursing Scholarship, 2002
- Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness?1999
- Evidence Suggesting That a Chronic Disease Self-Management Program Can Improve Health Status While Reducing HospitalizationMedical Care, 1999
- A Randomized Trial of a Lay Person-Led Self-Management Group Intervention for Back Pain Patients in Primary CareSpine, 1998
- Collaborative Management of Chronic IllnessAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1997
- The beneficial outcomes of the arthritis self‐management course are not adequately explained by behavior changeArthritis & Rheumatism, 1989