Method Variance in Organizational Research
Top Cited Papers
- 1 April 2006
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Organizational Research Methods
- Vol. 9 (2), 221-232
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105284955
Abstract
It has become widely accepted that correlations between variables measured with the same method, usually self-report surveys, are inflated due to the action of common method variance (CMV), despite a number of sources that suggest the problem is overstated. The author argues that the popular position suggesting CMV automatically affects variables measured with the same method is a distortion and oversimplification of the true state of affairs, reaching the status of urban legend. Empirical evidence is discussed casting doubt that the method itself produces systematic variance in observations that inflates correlations to any significant degree. It is suggested that the term common method variance be abandoned in favor of a focus on measurement bias that is the product of the interplay of constructs and methods by which they are assessed. A complex approach to dealing with potential biases involves their identification and control to rule them out as explanations for observed relationships using a variety of design strategies.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Outcomes and Correlates of Job Search Objectives: Searching to Leave or Searching for Leverage?Journal of Applied Psychology, 2004
- Method Effects of Positive Affectivity, Negative Affectivity, and Impression Management in Self-Reports of Work AttitudesHuman Performance, 2001
- The role of affectivity in job satisfaction: a meta-analysisPersonality and Individual Differences, 2000
- Common Methods Bias: Does Common Methods Variance Really Bias Results?Organizational Research Methods, 1998
- Relation Between Negative Affectivity and Positive Affectivity: Effects of Judged Desirability of Scale Items and Respondents' Social DesirabilityJournal of Personality Assessment, 1997
- Percept-percept inflation in microorganizational research: An investigation of prevalence and effect.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1994
- Negative affectivity as the underlying cause of correlations between stressors and strains.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1991
- Should negative affectivity remain an unmeasured variable in the study of job stress?Journal of Applied Psychology, 1988
- Stress at work and psychosomatic complaints: A causal interpretation.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1985
- Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychological Bulletin, 1959