Does personality predict mortality? Results from the GAZEL French prospective cohort study
Open Access
- 7 February 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in International Journal of Epidemiology
- Vol. 37 (2), 386-396
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyn013
Abstract
Background Majority of studies on personality and physical health have focused on one or two isolated personality traits. We aim to test the independent association of 10 personality traits, from three major conceptual models, with all-cause and cause-specific mortality in the French GAZEL cohort. Methods A total of 14 445 participants, aged 39–54 in 1993, completed the personality questionnaires composed of the Bortner Type-A scale, the Buss–Durkee Hostility Inventory (for total, neurotic and reactive hostility) and the Grossarth-Maticek–Eysenck Personality Stress Inventory that assesses six personality types [cancer-prone, coronary heart disease (CHD)-prone, ambivalent, healthy, rational, anti-social]. The association between personality traits and mortality, during a mean follow-up of 12.7 years, was assessed using the Relative Index of Inequality (RII) in Cox regression. Results In models adjusted for age, sex, marital status and education, all-cause and cause-specific mortality were predicted by ‘total hostility’, its ‘neurotic hostility’ component as well as by ‘CHD-prone’, ‘ambivalent’ ‘antisocial’, and ‘healthy’ personality types. After mutually adjusting personality traits for each other, only high ‘neurotic hostility’ remained a robust predictor of excess mortality from all causes [RII = 2.62; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.68–4.09] and external causes (RII = 3.24; 95% CI = 1.03–10.18). ‘CHD-prone’ (RII = 2.23; 95% CI = 0.72–6.95) and ‘anti-social’ (RII = 2.13; 95% CI 0.61–6.58) personality types were associated with cardiovascular mortality and with mortality from external causes, respectively, but CIs were wider. Adjustment for potential behavioural mediators had only a modest effect on these associations. Conclusions Neurotic hostility, CHD-prone personality and anti-social personality were all predictive of mortality outcomes. Further research is required to determine the precise mechanisms that contribute to these associations.Keywords
This publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cohort profile: the GAZEL Cohort StudyInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2006
- Hostility Scores Are Associated With Increased Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Women Undergoing Coronary Angiography: A Report from the NHLBI-Sponsored WISE StudyPsychosomatic Medicine, 2005
- Hostility, Age, and Mortality in a Sample of Cardiac PatientsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2005
- Prospective cohort study of hostility and the risk of cardiovascular disease mortalityInternational Journal of Cardiology, 2005
- PERSONALITY, STRESS, AND MOTIVATIONAL FACTORS IN DRINKING AS DETERMINANTS OF RISK FOR CANCER AND CORONARY HEART DISEASEPsychological Reports, 1991
- Type a Behavior and Mortality from Coronary Heart DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Type A score (Jenkins activity Survey) and risk of recurrent coronary heart disease in the aspirin myocardial infarction studyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1985
- Systemic hypertension, diuretic drugs, arrhythmias and deathThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1985
- Multivariate prediction of coronary heart disease during 8.5 year follow-up in the western collaborative group studyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1976
- A short rating scale as a potential measure of pattern a behaviorJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1969