The Benefit of a Second Burst Antitachycardia Sequence for Fast Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators
- 11 November 2013
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Vol. 37 (4), 486-494
- https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.12298
Abstract
In patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), an empirical burst of antitachycardia pacing (ATP) is moderately effective in terminating fast ventricular tachycardias (FVTs). It is unknown whether, in the case of failure of a first burst, a second burst attempt increases the efficacy of the intervention, without increasing morbidity. Our aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a strategy of programming successive ATP sequences for FVT episodes. A prospective study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of programming successive ATP sequences for termination of FVT episodes (cycle lengths [CLs] 250-320 ms) treated by one ATP sequence and, in the event of failure, by successive ATP attempts or shocks. Over a median follow-up of 54 months, 267 FVT episodes (mean CL of 295 ± 18 ms) were detected in 35 patients. Effectiveness of the first burst ATP was 64% (65% GEE-adjusted, where GEE is generalized estimating equation) and increased significantly to 83% (75% GEE-adjusted) with the second burst ATP sequence (P = 0.01). In the remaining 17% of FVT episodes with failure of the second ATP, successive bursts and shocks were required. Multivariate analysis showed that primary prevention ICD (odds ratio [OR] 5.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-14.5, P = 0.001), sinus rhythm (OR 4.34, 95% CI 1.4-13.4, P = 0.01), nonischemic cardiomyopathy (OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.2-4.8, P = 0.02), and longer VT CL (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.1-1.6, P = 0.002) were independently associated with effectiveness of the first or second burst pacing sequence. The addition of a second burst pacing attempt increases the effectiveness of ATP for FVT and, therefore, reduces the need for high-energy shocks.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Programming Antitachycardia Pacing for Primary Prevention in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: Results From the PROVE TrialJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2010
- Prospective multicenter randomized trial of fast ventricular tachycardia termination by prolonged versus conventional anti-tachyarrhythmia burst pacing in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients-Atp DeliVery for pAiNless ICD thErapy (ADVANCE-D) Trial resultsJournal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2010
- A Randomized Study to Compare Ramp Versus Burst Antitachycardia Pacing Therapies to Treat Fast Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter DefibrillatorsCirculation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 2009
- Prognostic Importance of Defibrillator Shocks in Patients with Heart FailureThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Antitachycardia Pacing for Spontaneous Rapid Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients with Prophylactic Cardioverter‐Defibrillator TherapyPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2006
- Fast ventricular tachycardias in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: Efficacy and safety of antitachycardia pacing: A prospective and randomized studyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2005
- Randomized, prospective comparison of four burst pacing algorithms for spontaneous ventricular tachycardiaThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1998
- A prospective randomized comparison of autodecremental pacing to burst pacing in device therapy for chronic ventricular tachycardia secondary to coronary artery diseaseThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1993