DSM-5: proposed changes to depressive disorders
- 9 February 2012
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Current Medical Research and Opinion
- Vol. 28 (3), 335-343
- https://doi.org/10.1185/03007995.2011.653436
Abstract
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) is currently undergoing a revision that will lead to a fifth edition in 2013. Proposed changes for DSM-5 include the creation of several new categories of depressive disorder. Some nosologists have expressed concern that the proposed changes could yield many ‘false-positive diagnoses’ in which normal distress is mislabeled as a mental disorder. Such confusion of normal distress and mental disorder undermines the interpretability of clinical trials and etiological research, causes inefficient allocation of resources, and incurs risks of unnecessary treatment. To evaluate these concerns, I critically examine five proposed DSM-5 expansions in the scope of depressive and grief disorders: (1) a new mixed anxiety/depression category; (2) a new premenstrual dysphoric disorder category; (3) elimination of the major depression bereavement exclusion; (4) elimination of the adjustment disorder bereavement exclusion, thus allowing the diagnosis of subsyndromal depressive symptoms during bereavement as adjustment disorders; and (5) a new category of adjustment disorder related to bereavement for diagnosing pathological non-depressive grief. I examine each proposal’s face validity and conceptual coherence as well as empirical support where relevant, with special attention to potential implications for false-positive diagnoses. I conclude that mixed anxiety/depression and premenstrual dysphoric disorder are needed categories, but are too broadly drawn and will yield substantial false positives; that the elimination of the bereavement exclusion is not supported by the evidence; and that the proposed elimination of the adjustment-disorder bereavement exclusion, as well as the new category of grief-related adjustment disorder, are inconsistent with recent grief research, which suggests that these proposals would massively pathologize normal grief responses.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Complicated grief and related bereavement issues for DSM-5Depression and Anxiety, 2011
- Considering adjustment disorders as stress response syndromes for DSM-5Depression and Anxiety, 2011
- IsDSM-IVBereavement Exclusion for Major Depression Relevant to Treatment Response?British Journal of Psychology, 2010
- Bereavement, Complicated Grief, and DSM, Part 1: DepressionBritish Journal of Psychology, 2010
- How common are common mental disorders? Evidence that lifetime prevalence rates are doubled by prospective versus retrospective ascertainmentPsychological Medicine, 2010
- Prolonged Grief Disorder: Psychometric Validation of Criteria Proposed for DSM-V and ICD-11PLoS Medicine, 2009
- Depression and the pitfalls of causality: Implications for DSM-VJournal of Affective Disorders, 2009
- The Importance of the Main Effect Even Within an Interaction Model: Elimination vs. Expansion of the Bereavement Exclusion in the Diagnostic Criteria for DepressionAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 2009
- Bereavement related and non-bereavement related depressions: A comparative field studyJournal of Affective Disorders, 2009
- Does Bereavement-Related Major Depression Differ From Major Depression Associated With Other Stressful Life Events?American Journal of Psychiatry, 2008