A global assessment of the social and conservation outcomes of protected areas
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 22 September 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Conservation Biology
- Vol. 30 (1), 133-141
- https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12568
Abstract
Protected areas (PAs) are a key strategy for protecting biological resources, but they vary considerably in their effectiveness and are frequently reported as having negative impacts on local people. This has contributed to a divisive and unresolved debate concerning the compatibility of environmental and socioeconomic development goals. Elucidating the relationship between positive and negative social impacts and conservation outcomes of PAs is key for the development of more effective and socially just conservation. We conducted a global meta-analysis on 165 PAs using data from 171 published studies. We assessed how PAs affect the well-being of local people, the factors associated with these impacts, and crucially the relationship between PAs' conservation and socioeconomic outcomes. Protected areas associated with positive socioeconomic outcomes were more likely to report positive conservation outcomes. Positive conservation and socioeconomic outcomes were more likely to occur when PAs adopted comanagement regimes, empowered local people, reduced economic inequalities, and maintained cultural and livelihood benefits. Whereas the strictest regimes of PA management attempted to exclude anthropogenic influences to achieve biological conservation objectives, PAs that explicitly integrated local people as stakeholders tended to be more effective at achieving joint biological conservation and socioeconomic development outcomes. Strict protection may be needed in some circumstances, yet our results demonstrate that conservation and development objectives can be synergistic and highlight management strategies that increase the probability of maximizing both conservation performance and development outcomes of PAs.Funding Information
- Leverhulme Trust
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- How national context, project design, and local community characteristics influence success in community-based conservation projectsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012
- Lessons about parks and poverty from a decade of forest loss and economic growth around Kibale National Park, UgandaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011
- Variable selection using random forestsPattern Recognition Letters, 2010
- Protected areas reduced poverty in Costa Rica and ThailandProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010
- Understanding the Lessons and Limitations of Conservation and DevelopmentConservation Biology, 2010
- An introduction to recursive partitioning: Rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests.Psychological Methods, 2009
- On the protection of “protected areas”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008
- Making resettlement work: The case of India’s Bhadra Wildlife SanctuaryBiological Conservation, 2007
- Biodiversity Conservation and the Eradication of PovertyScience, 2004
- Conservation–related Resettlement in Central Africa: Environmental and Social RisksDevelopment and Change, 2003