Advance Care Planing
- 1 November 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in The American Journal of Geriatric Cardiology
- Vol. 13 (6), 316-320
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1076-7460.2004.03954.x
Abstract
Advance directives allow patients to have some control over decisions even when they are no longer able to make decisions themselves. All states authorize written advance directives, such as the appointment of a health care proxy, but commonly impose procedural requirements. Some states have restricted the use of oral advance directives, although they are frequently used in everyday practice. Advance directives are limited because they are infrequently used, may not be informed, and may conflict with the patient's current best interests. Moreover, surrogates often cannot state patients' preferences accurately. Furthermore, discussions among physicians and patients about advance directives are flawed. Physicians can improve discussions about advance directives by asking the patient who should serve as proxy and by ascertaining the patient's values and general preferences before discussing specific clinical situations.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- The discussion about advance directives. Patient and physician opinions regarding when and how it should be conducted. End of Life Study GroupArchives of Internal Medicine, 1995
- Implementation of the patient self-determination act in a hospital setting. An initial evaluationArchives of Internal Medicine, 1995
- Relationship of advance directives to physician-patient communicationArchives of Internal Medicine, 1994
- Advance directives. Stability of patients' treatment choicesArchives of Internal Medicine, 1994
- Myth of substituted judgment. Surrogate decision making regarding life support is unreliableArchives of Internal Medicine, 1994
- Advance Directives for Medical Care — A Case for Greater UseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- A Prospective Study of Advance Directives for Life-Sustaining CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Quality of Life and Non-Treatment Decisions for Incompetent Patients: A Critique of the Orthodox ApproachLaw, Medicine and Health Care, 1989
- Patient attitudes to discussing life-sustaining treatmentArchives of Internal Medicine, 1986
- Preferences of Homosexual Men with AIDS for Life-Sustaining TreatmentNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986