Evaluating Fuzz Testing
- 15 October 2018
- conference paper
- conference paper
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 2123-2138
- https://doi.org/10.1145/3243734.3243804
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- National Science Foundation (CNS-1563722)
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (FA8750-15-2-0104)
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Browser fuzzing by scheduled mutation and generation of document object modelsPublished by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) ,2015
- Turning programs against each other: high coverage fuzz-testing using binary-code mutation and dynamic slicingPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,2015
- Program-Adaptive Mutational FuzzingPublished by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) ,2015
- Coverage is not strongly correlated with test suite effectivenessPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,2014
- Code coverage for suite evaluation by developersPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,2014
- Taming compiler fuzzersPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,2013
- Scheduling black-box mutational fuzzingPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,2013
- Making do with what we have: use your bootstrapsJournal Of Physiology-London, 2012
- Different tests for a difference: how do we do research?British Journal of Pharmacology, 2012
- The DaCapo benchmarksPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,2006