Bayes’ theorem and diagnostic tests in neuropsychology: Interval estimates for post-test probabilities
- 1 May 2009
- journal article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in The Clinical Neuropsychologist
- Vol. 23 (4), 624-644
- https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040802524229
Abstract
Most neuropsychologists are aware that, given the specificity and sensitivity of a test and an estimate of the base rate of a disorder, Bayes' theorem can be used to provide a post-test probability for the presence of the disorder given a positive test result (and a post-test probability for the absence of a disorder given a negative result). However, in the standard application of Bayes' theorem the three quantities (sensitivity, specificity, and the base rate) are all treated as fixed, known quantities. This is very unrealistic as there may be considerable uncertainty over these quantities and therefore even greater uncertainty over the post-test probability. Methods of obtaining interval estimates on the specificity and sensitivity of a test are set out. In addition, drawing and extending upon work by Mossman and Berger (2001), a Monte Carlo method is used to obtain interval estimates for post-test probabilities. All the methods have been implemented in a computer program, which is described and made available (www.abdn.ac.uk/~psy086/dept/BayesPTP.htm). When objective data on the base rate are lacking (or have limited relevance to the case at hand) the program elicits opinion for the pre-test probability.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- On the “Optimal” Size for Normative Samples in Neuropsychology: Capturing the Uncertainty When Normative Data Are Used to Quantify the Standing of a Neuropsychological Test ScoreChild Neuropsychology, 2008
- Comparison of a single case to a control or normative sample in neuropsychology: Development of a Bayesian approachCognitive Neuropsychology, 2007
- Statistical Methods for Eliciting Probability DistributionsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 2005
- Editorial.Neuropsychology, 2005
- A Meta-Analytic Review of Verbal Fluency Performance Following Focal Cortical Lesions.Neuropsychology, 2004
- Intervals for Posttest Probabilities: A Comparison of 5 MethodsMedical Decision Making, 2001
- Calibration of probabilities: The state of the art to 1980Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1982
- Cognitive Processes and the Assessment of Subjective Probability DistributionsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1975
- The assessment of subjective probability distributions: A training experimentActa Psychologica, 1973
- THE USE OF CONFIDENCE OR FIDUCIAL LIMITS ILLUSTRATED IN THE CASE OF THE BINOMIALBiometrika, 1934