The effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis
Top Cited Papers
- 18 March 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Surgical Endoscopy
- Vol. 25 (8), 2666-2677
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1627-z
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- CLINICAL ADVANTAGES OF ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION FOR GASTRIC CANCERS IN REMNANT STOMACH SURPASS CONVENTIONAL ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTIONDigestive Endoscopy, 2009
- Indications for the use of endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer in Japan: a comparative study with endoscopic submucosal dissectionEndoscopy, 2009
- Benefits of endoscopic submucosal dissection according to size and location of gastric neoplasm, compared with conventional mucosal resectionJournal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2009
- The modern treatment of early gastric cancer: our experience in an Italian cohortSurgical Endoscopy, 2009
- Treatment of gastric remnant cancer post distal gastrectomy by endoscopic submucosal dissection using an insulation-tipped diathermic knifeWorld Journal of Gastroenterology, 2008
- Advantage of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with EMR for early gastric cancerGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2006
- Endoscopic submucosal dissection allows curative resection of locally recurrent early gastric cancer after prior endoscopic mucosal resectionGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2006
- Clinical outcomes of EMR for gastric tumors: historical pilot evaluation between endoscopic submucosal dissection and conventional mucosal resectionGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2006
- Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986