Worker exposure to paraquat and diquat
- 1 January 1983
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
- Vol. 12 (1), 65-70
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01055003
Abstract
Exposure of workers applying paraquat to fields of tomatoes and citrus, and diquat to waterways containing water hyacinths and hydrilla, was monitored with dermal α-cellulose pads attached at each of ten body locations and with personal air monitors. Estimated total body exposure for tomato applicators was apparently influenced by tractor type. Exposure levels from highest to lowest were: open tractor > enclosed cab tractor ⩾ high-clearance tractor. Citrus applicators' exposure to paraquat averaged 28.5 mg/hr and 12.2 mg/hr, with tank concentrations of 0.11% and 0.07%, respectively. Diquat applicators received minimal exposure. Respiratory exposure was <0.1% of the total body exposure in all experiments. Urine samples collected periodically for all workers were, with one exception, without detectable pesticide contamination. Use of disposable coveralls and regularly washed impermeable gloves should effectively reduce exposure.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Worker exposure to arsenic in Florida grapefruit spray operationsArchives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 1982
- Loss of pesticides from patches used in the field as pesticide collectorsArchives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 1982
- Paraquat poisoning: An analytical toxicologic study of three casesToxicology, 1979
- DERMAL EXPOSURE TO PARAQUATThe Lancet, 1978
- Exposure to the herbicide, paraquatBulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 1975
- Nail damage in spray operators exposed to paraquatOccupational and Environmental Medicine, 1971
- Exposure of spray operators to paraquatOccupational and Environmental Medicine, 1969
- Nail Damage Associated with Handling of Paraquat and DiquatBMJ, 1969
- Ocular damage due to paraquat and diquat.BMJ, 1968
- Value of surface-area proportions in the prognosis of cutaneous burns and scaldsThe American Journal of Surgery, 1931