Illness perceptions and glycaemic control in diabetes: a systematic review with meta‐analysis
- 17 October 2011
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Diabetic Medicine
- Vol. 28 (11), 1300-1310
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03298.x
Abstract
Diabet. Med. 28, 1300–1310 (2011) Aims The Illness Perception Questionnaire, the Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire and the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire have been widely used to measure people’s beliefs about diabetes. This review aimed to synthesize evidence on the relationship between the dimensions of the Illness Perception Questionnaire, the Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire and the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire and HbA1c level in adults with diabetes. Methods A systematic literature search was carried out in January 2010 to identify relevant studies. Random‐effects model meta‐analyses were conducted with cross‐sectional data to quantify the relationship between Illness Perception Questionnaire dimensions and HbA1c across studies. Randomized controlled trials that targeted Illness Perception Questionnaire perceptions and included HbA1c as an outcome measure were discussed in a narrative review. Results Nine cross‐sectional studies and four randomized controlled trials were included. Stronger Identity (r+ = 0.14), Consequences (r+ = 0.14), Timeline Cyclical (r+ = 0.26) Concern (r+ = 0.21), and Emotional Representations (r+ = 0.18) perceptions had significant positive associations with HbA1c. Greater Personal Control (r+ = – 0.12) was negatively associated with HbA1c. For all relationships, heterogeneity tests were non‐significant, suggesting little variability in effect size estimates. Two of the four randomized controlled trials successfully changed illness perceptions, with one also reporting an intervention group reduction in HbA1c. Conclusions Some Illness Perception Questionnaire dimensions had small significant associations with HbA1c, although the direction of these associations remains unclear. There was also tentative evidence that illness perceptions can be positively changed through targeted intervention and that these changes may also impact on glycaemic control. Future research could benefit from tailoring intervention content to perceptions that are most highly associated with HbA1c.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Illness Perception and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Cross-sectional Questionnaire StudyCroatian Medical Journal, 2009
- Clinical effectiveness of a brief educational intervention in Type 1 diabetes: results from the BITES (Brief Intervention in Type 1 diabetes, Education for Self‐efficacy) trialDiabetic Medicine, 2008
- Effectiveness of the diabetes education and self management for ongoing and newly diagnosed (DESMOND) programme for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: cluster randomised controlled trialBMJ, 2008
- Brief Intervention in Type 1 diabetes – Education for Self-efficacy (BITES): Protocol for a randomised control trial to assess biophysical and psychological effectivenessBMC Endocrine Disorders, 2007
- Lay Explanations and Self-Management of Diabetes in Kathmandu, NepalJournal of Aging and Health, 2007
- Changing illness perceptions in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes, a randomised controlled trial of a family-based intervention: protocol and pilot studyBMC Family Practice, 2007
- Impact of self monitoring of blood glucose in the management of patients with non-insulin treated diabetes: open parallel group randomised trialBMJ, 2007
- Diabetes education and self-management for ongoing and newly diagnosed (DESMOND): Process modelling of pilot studyPatient Education and Counseling, 2006
- The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.Psychological Bulletin, 1979