Comparison of LED and Conventional Fluorescence Microscopy for Detection of Acid Fast Bacilli in a Low-Incidence Setting
Open Access
- 21 July 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 6 (7), e22495
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022495
Abstract
Light emitting diode fluorescence microscopes have many practical advantages over conventional mercury vapour fluorescence microscopes, which would make them the preferred choice for laboratories in both low- and high-resource settings, provided performance is equivalent. In a nested case-control study, we compared diagnostic accuracy and time required to read slides with the Zeiss PrimoStar iLED, LW Scientific Lumin, and a conventional fluorescence microscope (Leica DMLS). Mycobacterial culture was used as the reference standard, and subgroup analysis by specimen source and organism isolated were performed. There was no difference in sensitivity or specificity between the three microscopes, and agreement was high for all comparisons and subgroups. The Lumin and the conventional fluorescence microscope were equivalent with respect to time required to read smears, but the Zeiss iLED was significantly time saving compared to both. Light emitting diode microscopy should be considered by all tuberculosis diagnostic laboratories, including those in high income countries, as a replacement for conventional fluorescence microscopes. Our findings provide support to the recent World Health Organization policy recommending that conventional fluorescence microscopy be replaced by light emitting diode microscopy using auramine staining in all settings where fluorescence microscopy is currently used.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fading of Auramine-Stained Mycobacterial Smears and Implications for External Quality AssuranceJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2011
- Performance of LED-Based Fluorescence Microscopy to Diagnose Tuberculosis in a Peripheral Health Centre in NairobiPLOS ONE, 2011
- Performance of Three LED-Based Fluorescence Microscopy Systems for Detection of Tuberculosis in UgandaPLOS ONE, 2010
- The CyScope® Fluorescence Microscope, a Reliable Tool for Tuberculosis Diagnosis in Resource-Limited SettingsThe American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2010
- Tuberculosis Diagnosis — Time for a Game ChangeThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Usefulness of the Paralens™ Fluorescent Microscope Adaptor for the Identification of Mycobacteria in Both Field and Laboratory SettingsThe Open Microbiology Journal, 2010
- Biomarkers and diagnostics for tuberculosis: progress, needs, and translation into practiceThe Lancet, 2010
- Use of Light‐Emitting Diode Fluorescence Microscopy to Detect Acid‐Fast Bacilli in SputumClinical Infectious Diseases, 2008
- THE USE OF CONFIDENCE OR FIDUCIAL LIMITS ILLUSTRATED IN THE CASE OF THE BINOMIALBiometrika, 1934