The tool for the automatic analysis of text cohesion (TAACO): Automatic assessment of local, global, and text cohesion
- 28 September 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Behavior Research Methods
- Vol. 48 (4), 1227-1237
- https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0651-7
Abstract
This study introduces the Tool for the Automatic Analysis of Cohesion (TAACO), a freely available text analysis tool that is easy to use, works on most operating systems (Windows, Mac, and Linux), is housed on a user’s hard drive (rather than having an Internet interface), allows for the batch processing of text files, and incorporates over 150 classic and recently developed indices related to text cohesion. The study validates TAACO by investigating how its indices related to local, global, and overall text cohesion can predict expert judgments of text coherence and essay quality. The findings of this study provide predictive validation of TAACO and support the notion that expert judgments of text coherence and quality are either negatively correlated or not predicted by local and overall text cohesion indices, but are positively predicted by global indices of cohesion. Combined, these findings provide supporting evidence that coherence for expert raters is a property of global cohesion and not of local cohesion, and that expert ratings of text quality are positively related to global cohesion.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predicting second language writing proficiency: the roles of cohesion and linguistic sophisticationJournal of Research in Reading, 2010
- Coh-Metrix: Capturing Linguistic Features of CohesionDiscourse Processes, 2010
- Linguistic Features of Writing QualityWritten Communication, 2009
- Reversing the Reverse Cohesion Effect: Good Texts Can Be Better for Strategic, High-Knowledge ReadersDiscourse Processes, 2007
- An analytic and cognitive parameterization of coherence relationsCognitive Linguistics, 2002
- Reading both high-coherence and low-coherence texts: Effects of text sequence and prior knowledge.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 2001
- Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherenceDiscourse Processes, 1996
- Are Good Texts Always Better? Interactions of Text Coherence, Background Knowledge, and Levels of Understanding in Learning From TextCognition and Instruction, 1996
- WordNetCommunications of the ACM, 1995
- Coherence and Academic Writing: Some Definitions and Suggestions for TeachingTESOL Quarterly, 1986