A comparison of supervised learning techniques in the classification of bat echolocation calls
- 13 August 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Ecological Informatics
- Vol. 5 (6), 465-473
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2010.08.001
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- EpiCollect: Linking Smartphones to Web Applications for Epidemiology, Ecology and Community Data CollectionPLOS ONE, 2009
- Classification of Echolocation Calls from 14 Species of Bat by Support Vector Machines and Ensembles of Neural NetworksAlgorithms, 2009
- Predictor correlation impacts machine learning algorithms: implications for genomic studiesBioinformatics, 2009
- Human vs. machine: identification of bat species from their echolocation calls by humans and by artificial neural networksCanadian Journal of Zoology, 2008
- EFFECT OF HABITAT AND FORAGING HEIGHT ON BAT ACTIVITY IN THE COASTAL PLAIN OF SOUTH CAROLINAThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 2005
- Variability in echolocation call design of 26 Swiss bat species: consequences, limits and options for automated field identification with a synergetic pattern recognition approachMammalia, 2004
- The support vector machine under testNeurocomputing, 2003
- Identification of twenty‐two bat species (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from Italy by analysis of time‐expanded recordings of echolocation callsJournal of Zoology, 2002
- Confronting the Dogma: a ReplyJournal of Mammalogy, 1999
- IDENTIFICATION OF BRITISH BAT SPECIES BY MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS OF ECHOLOCATION CALL PARAMETERSBioacoustics, 1997