The second language programme‐evaluation literature: Accommodating experimental and multifaceted approaches
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Language, Culture and Curriculum
- Vol. 3 (1), 83-92
- https://doi.org/10.1080/07908319009525074
Abstract
This paper considers the extent to which the various proposals and concerns associated with the two main approaches to second‐language programme evaluation (‘experimental’ versus ‘multifaceted’) should be considered prescriptive in conducting individual studies. The issue is examined in relation to the four main evaluation studies reported in this Special Issue as well as in relation to a study of the primary school second‐language programme in Irish. It is argued that while each of the two approaches to evaluation will be appropriate in very different circumstances, both should be accommodated in a broadly defined second‐language programme‐evaluation literature.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Language and literacy acquisition in bilingual contextsJournal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1989
- National assessment of Irish‐language speaking and listening skills in primary‐school children: Research issues in the evaluation of school‐based heritage‐language programmesLanguage, Culture and Curriculum, 1988
- A CASE FOR FIELD‐EXPERIMENTATION IN PROGRAM EVALUATION1Language Learning, 1986
- Toward a Methodology of ESL Program EvaluationTESOL Quarterly, 1986
- Expanding Our Evaluation Perspective: What Can Classroom Observation Tell Us About Core French Programs?The Canadian Modern Language Review / La revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 1985
- Differences in the Communicative Orientation of L2 ClassroomsTESOL Quarterly, 1985
- Age on Arrival and Immigrant Second Language Learning in Canada: A ReassessmentApplied Linguistics, 1981
- THE ROLE OF INTELLIGENCE IN SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING1Language Learning, 1976