Validation of the "World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS-2" in patients with chronic diseases
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 19 May 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
- Vol. 8 (1), 51
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-51
Abstract
The WHODAS-2 is a disability assessment instrument based on the conceptual framework of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). It provides a global measure of disability and 7 domain-specific scores. The aim of this study was to assess WHODAS-2 conceptual model and metric properties in a set of chronic and prevalent clinical conditions accounting for a wide scope of disability in Europe. 1,119 patients with one of 13 chronic conditions were recruited in 7 European centres. Participants were clinically evaluated and administered the WHODAS-2 and the SF-36 at baseline, 6 weeks and 3 months of follow-up. The latent structure was explored and confirmed by factor analysis (FA). Reliability was assessed in terms of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and reproducibility (intra-class correlation coefficients, ICC). Construct validity was evaluated by correlating the WHODAS-2 and SF-36 domains, and comparing known groups based on the clinical-severity and work status. Effect size (ES) coefficient was used to assess responsiveness. To assess reproducibility and responsiveness, subsamples of stable (at 6 weeks) and improved (after 3 moths) patients were defined, respectively, according to changes in their clinical-severity. The satisfactory FA goodness of fit indexes confirmed a second order factor structure with 7 dimensions, and a global score for the WHODAS-2. Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.77 (self care) to 0.98 (life activities: work or school), and the ICC was lower, but achieved the recommended standard of 0.7 for four domains. Correlations between global WHODAS-2 score and the different domains of the SF-36 ranged from -0.29 to -0.65. Most of the WHODAS-2 scores showed statistically significant differences among clinical-severity groups for all pathologies, and between working patients and those not working due to ill health (p < 0.001). Among the subsample of patients who had improved, responsiveness coefficients were small to moderate (ES = 0.3-0.7), but higher than those of the SF-36. The latent structure originally designed by WHODAS-2 developers has been confirmed for the first time, and it has shown good metric properties in clinic and rehabilitation samples. Therefore, considerable support is provided to the WHODAS-2 utilization as an international instrument to measure disability based on the ICF model.Keywords
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Modified WHODAS-II provides valid measure of global disability but filter items increased skewnessJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2008
- Der WHODAS II in der Anwendung bei Schlaganfallpatienten und ihren Angehörigen: Reliabilität und Inter-Rater-ReliabilitätDie Rehabilitation, 2008
- The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Medical Care, 1993
- The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Medical Care, 1992
- The american college of rheumatology 1991 revised criteria for the classification of global functional status in rheumatoid arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1992
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosisNeurology, 1983
- A Rating Scale for Mania: Reliability, Validity and SensitivityThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1978
- Studies of Illness in the AgedJAMA, 1963
- Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of testsPsychometrika, 1951