Should Progressive Perineal Dilation be Considered First Line Therapy for Vaginal Agenesis?

Abstract

Purpose: In women with vaginal agenesis progressive perineal dilation provides a minimally invasive method to create a functional vagina without the attendant risks or complications of traditional surgical options. We report our 12-year experience with this technique. Materials and Methods: Patients with vaginal agenesis treated at our institution were analyzed retrospectively and followed prospectively using case report forms and semistructured interviews. Patients diagnosed with vaginal agenesis were counseled on vaginal reconstruction options. Those electing progressive perineal dilation were instructed on the proper use of vaginal dilators by one of us (MRL) and advised to dilate 2 or 3 times daily for 20 minutes. All patients received physician, nursing and social work education and counseling. Parameters reviewed included primary diagnosis, start and end of vaginal dilation, dilation frequency, dilator size, sexual activity and whether the patient experienced pain or bleeding with dilation or sexual activity. Functional success was defined as the ability to achieve sexual intercourse, vaginal acceptance of the largest dilator without discomfort or a vaginal length of 7 cm. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with successful neovaginal creation. Results: From 1996 to 2008 we enrolled 69 females with vaginal agenesis in a progressive perineal dilation program. The primary diagnosis was Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome in 64 patients. Mean age at the start of vaginal dilation was 17.5 years (range 14 to 35) Mean followup was 19 months (range 0 to 100). Four patients (5.7%) were lost to followup. In 7 of the remaining 65 patients (12%) treatment failed due to noncompliance and 50 (88%) achieved functional success at a median of 18.7 months. Patients who dilated frequently (once daily or greater) achieved a functional neovagina at a mean ± SD of 4.3 ± 2.4 months. Functional success correlated positively with frequent (once daily or greater) dilation and the initiation of sexual activity. Complications were minor. Three patients reported infrequent pain and 2 reported a single episode of bleeding with dilation. A total of 18 sexually active patients reported satisfactory intercourse without dyspareunia. Conclusions: Progressive perineal dilation for neovaginal creation is a valuable, minimally invasive therapy to create a functional vagina with a high success rate and a much lower complication rate than that in published surgical series. Given these findings, progressive perineal dilation should be offered as first line therapy in adolescents with a congenitally absent vagina.