Does Impaired Cerebrovascular Reactivity Predict Stroke Risk in Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis?
Open Access
- 1 June 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Stroke
- Vol. 42 (6), 1550-1555
- https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.110.609057
Abstract
Improved methods are required to identify the subgroup of patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis who will have stroke develop. It has been suggested that impaired cerebral reactivity (CVR) may predict high risk, but no multicenter studies have examined this. In a preplanned substudy of Asymptomatic Carotid Emboli Study, 106 patients were recruited with ≥70% asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Transcranial Doppler was used to measure CVR with a vasodilatory response of carbon dioxide or acetazolamide. A meta-analysis of the data with previously published studies was performed. Thirty-two of 106 (30.2%) had severely impaired CVR ipsilateral to the study artery. Mean follow-up was 680 days. There were no ipsilateral strokes. There was a nonsignificant trend to more secondary end points of any stroke/TIA in patients with severely impaired CVR. Three of 32 (9.4%) had impaired CVR compared with 2 of 74 (2.7%) without (hazard ratio, 2.54; 95% CI, 0.61–21.74; P =0.158). On meta-analysis of the Asymptomatic Carotid Emboli Study data with previous studies, impaired CVR was associated with increased risk of ipsilateral stroke alone (OR, 6.14; 95% CI, 1.27–29.5; P =0.02), ipsilateral stroke or TIA (OR, 4.76; 95% CI, 1.86–12.16; P =0.001), and any stroke (OR, 4.66; 95% CI, 1.69–12.85; P =0.003). In this international multicenter study, we found no association between impaired CVR and recurrent events, but the study was underpowered because of the low event rate. Meta-analysis of available data suggested an association between impaired CVR and future risk. However, currently there are insufficient data to justify the routine clinical use of CVR to stratify risk in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis for selection for carotid endarterectomy.This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of Intensive Medical Therapy on Microemboli and Cardiovascular Risk in Asymptomatic Carotid StenosisArchives of Neurology, 2010
- Low Risk of Ipsilateral Stroke in Patients With Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis on Best Medical TreatmentStroke, 2010
- Medical (Nonsurgical) Intervention Alone Is Now Best for Prevention of Stroke Associated With Asymptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis Results of a Systematic Review and AnalysisStroke, 2009
- Who Benefits Most from Intervention for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis: Patients or Professionals?European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2009
- Carotid endarterectomy—An evidence-based reviewNeurology, 2005
- Carotid endarterectomyThe Lancet, 2004
- Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2004
- Severely impaired cerebrovascular reactivity predicts stroke and TIA risk in patients with carotid artery stenosis and occlusionBrain, 2001
- Impaired Clearance of Emboli (Washout) Is an Important Link Between Hypoperfusion, Embolism, and Ischemic StrokeArchives of Neurology, 1998
- Endarterectomy for Asymptomatic Carotid Artery StenosisJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 1995