Quantum physics in neuroscience and psychology: a neurophysical model of mind–brain interaction
Open Access
- 29 June 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by The Royal Society in Philosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
- Vol. 360 (1458), 1309-1327
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1598
Abstract
Neuropsychological research on the neural basis of behaviour generally posits that brain mechanisms will ultimately suffice to explain all psychologically described phenomena. This assumption stems from the idea that the brain is made up entirely of material particles and fields, and that all causal mechanisms relevant to neuroscience can therefore be formulated solely in terms of properties of these elements. Thus, terms having intrinsic mentalistic and/or experiential content (e.g. ‘feeling’, ‘knowing’ and ‘effort’) are not included as primary causal factors. This theoretical restriction is motivated primarily by ideas about the natural world that have been known to be fundamentally incorrect for more than three-quarters of a century. Contemporary basic physical theory differs profoundly from classic physics on the important matter of how the consciousness of human agents enters into the structure of empirical phenomena. The new principles contradict the older idea that local mechanical processes alone can account for the structure of all observed empirical data. Contemporary physical theory brings directly and irreducibly into the overall causal structure certain psychologically described choices made by human agents about how they will act. This key development in basic physical theory is applicable to neuroscience, and it provides neuroscientists and psychologists with an alternative conceptual framework for describing neural processes. Indeed, owing to certain structural features of ion channels critical to synaptic function, contemporary physical theory must in principle be used when analysing human brain dynamics. The new framework, unlike its classic-physics-based predecessor, is erected directly upon, and is compatible with, the prevailing principles of physics. It is able to represent more adequately than classic concepts the neuroplastic mechanisms relevant to the growing number of empirical studies of the capacity of directed attention and mental effort to systematically alter brain function.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- “Change the mind and you change the brain”: effects of cognitive-behavioral therapy on the neural correlates of spider phobiaNeuroImage, 2003
- Differences in Apparent Pore Sizes of Low and High Voltage-activated Ca2+ ChannelsPublished by Elsevier BV ,2002
- The basis problem in many-worlds theoriesCanadian Journal of Physics, 2002
- Quantum computation in brain microtubules: Decoherence and biological feasibilityPhysical Review E, 2002
- Systematic Changes in Cerebral Glucose Metabolic Rate After Successful Behavior Modification Treatment of Obsessive-Compulsive DisorderArchives of General Psychiatry, 1996
- A new theory of the relationship of mind and matterPhilosophical Psychology, 1990
- The Zeno’s paradox in quantum theoryJournal of Mathematical Physics, 1977
- Atomic Physics and Human KnowledgeAmerican Journal of Physics, 1958
- "Relative State" Formulation of Quantum MechanicsReviews of Modern Physics, 1957
- A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of "Hidden" Variables. IPhysical Review B, 1952