Immediate and long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on delivery of surgical services
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 30 April 2020
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 107 (10), 1250-1261
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11670
Abstract
Background The ongoing pandemic is having a collateral health effect on delivery of surgical care to millions of patients. Very little is known about pandemic management and effects on other services, including delivery of surgery. Methods This was a scoping review of all available literature pertaining to COVID‐19 and surgery, using electronic databases, society websites, webinars and preprint repositories. Results Several perioperative guidelines have been issued within a short time. Many suggestions are contradictory and based on anecdotal data at best. As regions with the highest volume of operations per capita are being hit, an unprecedented number of operations are being cancelled or deferred. No major stakeholder seems to have considered how a pandemic deprives patients with a surgical condition of resources, with patients disproportionally affected owing to the nature of treatment (use of anaesthesia, operating rooms, protective equipment, physical invasion and need for perioperative care). No recommendations exist regarding how to reopen surgical delivery. The postpandemic evaluation and future planning should involve surgical services as an essential part to maintain appropriate surgical care for the population during an outbreak. Surgical delivery, owing to its cross‐cutting nature and synergistic effects on health systems at large, needs to be built into the WHO agenda for national health planning. Conclusion Patients are being deprived of surgical access, with uncertain loss of function and risk of adverse prognosis as a collateral effect of the pandemic. Surgical services need a contingency plan for maintaining surgical care in an ongoing or postpandemic phase.This publication has 86 references indexed in Scilit:
- What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciencesBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2018
- Cancelled Procedures in the English NHS: Evidence from the 2010 Tariff ReformHealth Economics, 2017
- Adoption of routine telemedicine in Norwegian hospitals: progress over 5 yearsBMC Health Services Research, 2016
- Quality of care for remote orthopaedic consultations using telemedicine: a randomised controlled trialBMC Health Services Research, 2016
- Size and distribution of the global volume of surgery in 2012Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2016
- Problems and solutions in delivering global surgery in the 21st centuryBritish Journal of Surgery, 2015
- Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviewsJBI Evidence Implementation, 2015
- Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reportingJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2014
- Moral dilemmas faced by hospitals in time of war: the Rambam Medical Center during the Second Lebanon WarMedicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 2013
- Elective surgical case cancellation in the Veterans Health Administration system: identifying areas for improvementThe American Journal of Surgery, 2009