The h index research output measurement: Two approaches to enhance its accuracy
- 31 July 2010
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Informetrics
- Vol. 4 (3), 407-414
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.03.005
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Are there really two types of h index variants? A validation study by using molecular life sciences dataResearch Evaluation, 2009
- Do we need the h index and its variants in addition to standard bibliometric measures?Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2009
- Citation StatisticsStatistical Science, 2009
- The state of h index researchEMBO Reports, 2008
- Does the Committee Peer Review Select the Best Applicants for Funding? An Investigation of the Selection Process for Two European Molecular Biology Organization ProgrammesPLOS ONE, 2008
- Beyond the Durfee square: Enhancing the h-index to score total publication outputScientometrics, 2008
- Citation counts for research evaluation: standards of good practice for analyzing bibliometric data and presenting and interpreting resultsEthics in Science and Environmental Politics, 2008
- Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicineJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008
- What do we know about the h index?Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007
- Tutorial in Biostatistics: Analyzing Associations between Total Plasma Homocysteine and B Vitamins Using Optimal Categorization and Segmented RegressionNeuroepidemiology, 2006