Retrievable inferior vena cava filters in high-risk patients undergoing bariatric surgery
- 28 January 2009
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Surgical Endoscopy
- Vol. 23 (10), 2203-2207
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0307-0
Abstract
Placement of retrievable inferior vena cava filters (rIVCF) may be beneficial in high-risk morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric procedures. Patients with a previous history of venous thromboembolism (VTE) are at high risk for postoperative deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). A prospective database of bariatric surgery patients was studied from April 2003 to May 2007. A total of 791 patients underwent bariatric procedures, of which 30 (4%) had a previous history of VTE. These patients underwent preoperative venous duplex and concurrent placement of a rIVCF. Patient demographics and clinical outcomes were examined. Thirty patients (12 (40%) men) had a mean age of 49 ± 8 years and a mean body mass index of 50 ± 8 kg/m2. Sixteen patients (53%) underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, ten (33%) underwent laparoscopic adjustable gastric band, and four (14%) underwent open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Mean operative time, including rIVCF placement, was 162 ± 66 minutes. All patients had successful rIVCF placement with standard perioperative chemoprophylaxis. Twenty-nine patients (97%) had a follow-up ultrasound on postoperative day (POD) 19 ± 25. Six patients (21%) had recurrent DVT. Twenty-seven patients (90%) underwent a follow-up venogram, and four patients (15%) had significant thrombus in the rIVCF. Retrieval was successful in 21 patients (70%). Nine patients (30%) did not undergo retrieval: four had significant thrombus in the filter, four had an above-knee DVT, and one due to technical reasons. We observed one complication with a DVT at the access site and no PE or mortality. We observed a 21% incidence of recurrent DVT and 15% incidence of thrombus in the IVCF, yet no PE occurred. IVCF retrieval was successful in 70% with one complication. Concurrent IVCF placement is safe, feasible, and an effective preventative measure in high-risk morbidly obese patients. We recommend the use of rIVCFs in conjunction with standard VTE prophylaxis in this patient population.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparison of thromboembolic and bleeding events following laparoscopic gastric bypass in patients treated with prophylactic regimens of unfractionated heparin or enoxaparinThe American Journal of Surgery, 2007
- Inferior vena cava filter placement for pulmonary embolism risk reduction in super morbidly obese undergoing bariatric surgerySurgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 2007
- Safety, feasibility, and outcome of retrievable vena cava filters in high-risk surgical patientsJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2007
- Experience with inferior vena cava filter placement in patients undergoing open gastric bypass proceduresJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2006
- Pulmonary Embolism Complicating Bariatric Surgery: Detailed Analysis of a Single Institution’s 24-Year ExperienceJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2006
- Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity in the United States, 1999-2004Published by American Medical Association (AMA) ,2006
- Enoxaparin for Thromboprophylaxis in Morbidly Obese Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: Findings of the Prophylaxis Against VTE Outcomes in Bariatric Surgery Patients Receiving Enoxaparin (PROBE) StudyObesity Surgery, 2005
- Prospective analysis of the incidence of deep venous thrombosis in bariatric surgery patientsSurgery, 2005
- Incidence of clinically evident deep venous thrombosis after Laroscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric bypassSurgical Endoscopy, 2004
- Heparin Thromboprophylaxis in Gastric Bypass SurgeryObesity Surgery, 2003