Using patients’ experiences to identify priorities for quality improvement in breast cancer care: patient narratives, surveys or both?
Open Access
- 22 August 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Health Services Research
- Vol. 12 (1), 271
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-271
Abstract
Patients’ experiences have become central to assessing the performance of healthcare systems worldwide and are increasingly being used to inform quality improvement processes. This paper explores the relative value of surveys and detailed patient narratives in identifying priorities for improving breast cancer services as part of a quality improvement process. One dataset was collected using a narrative interview approach, (n = 13) and the other using a postal survey (n = 82). Datasets were analyzed separately and then compared to determine whether similar priorities for improving patient experiences were identified. There were both similarities and differences in the improvement priorities arising from each approach. Day surgery was specifically identified as a priority in the narrative dataset but included in the survey recommendations only as part of a broader priority around improving inpatient experience. Both datasets identified appointment systems, patients spending enough time with staff, information about treatment and side effects and more information at the end of treatment as priorities. The specific priorities identified by the narrative interviews commonly related to ‘relational’ aspects of patient experience. Those identified by the survey typically related to more ‘functional’ aspects and were not always sufficiently detailed to identify specific improvement actions. Our analysis suggests that whilst local survey data may act as a screening tool to identify potential problems within the breast cancer service, they do not always provide sufficient detail of what to do to improve that service. These findings may have wider applicability in other services. We recommend using an initial preliminary survey, with better use of survey open comments, followed by an in-depth qualitative analysis to help deliver improvements to relational and functional aspects of patient experience.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Implementing patient-centred cancer care: using experience-based co-design to improve patient experience in breast and lung cancer servicesSupportive Care in Cancer, 2012
- Factors affecting the use of patient survey data for quality improvement in the Veterans Health AdministrationBMC Health Services Research, 2011
- Historical Views on Psychiatry for the PersonInternational Journal of Person Centered Medicine, 2011
- Reporting cancer patients' experiences of care for quality improvement: analysis of 2000 and 2004 survey results for South East EnglandJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2010
- Development, Implementation, and Public Reporting of the HCAHPS SurveyMedical Care Research and Review, 2009
- Application of quality improvement strategies in 389 European hospitals: results of the MARQuIS projectQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2009
- Evaluating the use of a modified CAHPS® survey to support improvements in patient‐centred care: lessons from a quality improvement collaborativeHealth Expectations, 2008
- Experience-based design: from redesigning the system around the patient to co-designing services with the patientQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2006
- Hearing the patient's voice? Factors affecting the use of patient survey data in quality improvementQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2005
- The Patients Accelerating Change Project: does it make any difference?Clinical Governance: An International Journal, 2005