Does it make sense to use two internal thoracic arteries?
- 30 June 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
- Vol. 59 (6), 1456-1463
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(95)00183-l
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Similar hospital morbidity with the use of one or two internal thoracic arteriesThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1994
- Results of internal thoracic artery grafting over 15 years: single versus double graftsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1992
- The return of clinically evident ischemia after coronary artery bypass graftingEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 1991
- Results of internal thoracic artery grafting over 15 years: Single versus double graftsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1990
- Internal mammary artery: methods of use and their effect on survival after coronary bypass surgeryEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 1990
- Fifteen-year results of coronary artery bypass for isolated left anterior descending coronary artery diseaseThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1989
- Internal Mammary Artery versus Saphenous Vein Graft to the Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery: Prospective Randomized Study with 10-Year Follow-upThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1988
- Influence of the Internal-Mammary-Artery Graft on 10-Year Survival and Other Cardiac EventsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Association between early graft patency and late outcome for patients undergoing artery bypass graft surgery.Circulation, 1984
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958