Observation and comparison of polished composite surfaces with the aid of SEM and profilometer..
- 1 May 1982
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
- Vol. 9 (3), 203-216
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1982.tb01010.x
Abstract
After cleaning with an abrasive toothpaste, fourteen polished composites were examined in vitro SEM and profilometrically. It was shown that the smooth surface composites kept a remarkable smoothness. The classic composites coarsened profilometrically eight times under these testing conditions, and the glass-ionomers fourteen times. SEM pictures pointed out that the organic matrix was the weakest link for classic composites as well as for glass-ionomer cements. The glass-ionomers were the roughest group because of the larger grain size, numerous cracks and porosities. The porosities hampered the roughness measurements in all materials and contributed to a large extent to the roughness of the products.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Observation and comparison of polished composite surfaces with the aid of SEM and profilometer.Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 1982
- Relationship between abrasive wear and microstructure of composite resinsThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1978
- Clinical characteristics of a glass-ionomer cementBritish Dental Journal, 1978
- Ceramic Hydroxylapatite as a Plaque Growth and Drug Screening SubstrateJournal of Dental Research, 1977
- Surface roughness of restorationsBritish Dental Journal, 1976
- In Vitro Wear Response of Composite Resin, Amalgam, and EnamelJournal of Dental Research, 1975
- Plaque accumulation on composite surfaces after various finishing proceduresThe Journal of the American Dental Association, 1975
- Effect of Toothbrushing on Acrylic Resin Veneering Material: II Abrasive Effect of Selected Dentifrices and ToothbrushesActa Odontologica Scandinavica, 1972
- Surface Roughness of Composite Resins Before and After FinishingActa Odontologica Scandinavica, 1972