Psychomotor skills assessment in practicing surgeons experienced in performing advanced laparoscopic procedures
- 30 September 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Journal of the American College of Surgeons
- Vol. 197 (3), 479-488
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s1072-7515(03)00535-0
Abstract
Background Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has introduced a new and unique set of psychomotor skills for a surgeon to acquire and master. Although assessment technologies have been proposed, precise and objective psychomotor skills assessment of surgeons performing laparoscopic procedures has not been detailed. Study design Two hundred ten surgeons attending the 2001 annual meeting of the American College of Surgeons in New Orleans who reported having completed more than 50 laparoscopic procedures participated. Subjects were required to complete one box-trainer laparoscopic cutting task and a similar virtual reality task. These tasks were specifically designed to test only psychomotor and not cognitive skills. Both tasks were completed twice. Performance of tasks was assessed and analyzed. Demographic and laparoscopic experience data were also collected. Results Complete data were available on 195 surgeons. In this group, surgeons performed the box-trainer task better with their dominant hand (p < 0.0001) and there was a strong and statistically significant correlation between trials (r = 0.47 − 0.64, p < 0.0001). After transforming raw data to z-scores (mean = 0 and SD = 1) it was shown that between 2% and 12% of surgeons performed more than two standard deviations from the mean. Some surgeons’ performance was 20 standard deviations from the mean. Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer Virtual Reality metrics demonstrated high measurement consistency as assessed by coefficient alpha (α = 0.849). Conclusions Objective assessment of laparoscopic psychomotor skills is now possible. Surgeons who had performed more than 50 laparoscopic procedures showed considerable variability in their performance on a simple laparoscopic and virtual reality task. Approximately 10% of surgeons tested performed the task significantly worse than the group’s average performance. Studies such as this may form the methodology for establishing criteria levels and performance objectives in objective assessment of the technical skills component of determining surgical competence.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Virtual Reality Training Improves Operating Room PerformanceAnnals of Surgery, 2002
- A computer-based laparoscopic skills assessment device differentiates experienced from novice laparoscopic surgeonsSurgical Endoscopy, 2001
- Virtual reality training leads to faster adaptation to the novel psychomotor restrictions encountered by laparoscopic surgeonsSurgical Endoscopy, 2001
- A case-control comparison of traditional and virtual-reality training in laparoscopic psychomotor performanceMinimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies, 2000
- Experienced Laparoscopic Surgeons are Automated to the “Fulcrum Effect”: An Ergonomic DemonstrationEndoscopy, 1999
- An Ergonomic Analysis of the Fulcrum Effect in the Acquisition of Endoscopic SkillsEndoscopy, 1998
- The dramatic reality of biliary tract injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomySurgical Endoscopy, 1997
- The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomyThe American Journal of Surgery, 1995
- Whither minimal access surgery: tribulations and expectationsThe American Journal of Surgery, 1995
- An External Audit of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Performed in Medical Treatment Facilities of the Department of DefenseAnnals of Surgery, 1994