Biological basis for human capacitation—revisited
- 23 January 2017
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Human Reproduction Update
- Vol. 23 (3), 289-299
- https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmw048
Abstract
BACKGROUND A little more than a decade ago a review entitled ‘Biological basis for human capacitation’ was published. A primary conclusion of the review was that with all the technological advances that have been made since the first experiments demonstrated the in vivo requirement of capacitation for fertilization, very little progress had since been made, most significantly for human. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE The present review was carried out to provide an update on the biological basis for human capacitation. It briefly revisits the original schema, presents a review of the literature that urged research interest in human sperm capacitation and puts under the spotlight the original definition of capacitation balanced against the limitations of experiments in vitro to characterize a complex process that necessarily mandates a female component, and very recent findings in the mouse. It also includes proposed considerations for new thinking regarding capacitation, and progress toward understanding the biology of human capacitation. SEARCH METHODS The PubMed, Google Scholar and Scopus literature databases were reviewed extensively using inclusive, broad and multispecies search terms without publication date limitation. OUTCOMES Comprehensive screening of the literature database showed that no papers regarding human sperm capacitation in vivo have been published in the past 20 years. Recent experiments in the mouse have provided compelling and unanticipated data regarding capacitation and in vivo fertilization. Questions were posed and addressed regarding: stimuli for initiation of capacitation, capacitation relative to the cumulus–oocyte complex, comparison between in vivo and in vitro capacitation, and potential species-specific differences in location and timing of capacitation. WIDER IMPLICATIONS There has been no progress on the in vivo biology of human sperm capacitation since before the turn of the century. Human IVF and its technologies may likely have inhibited, and continue to hold back, any future in vivo experiments that would address one or more questions regarding acquisition of fertilizing capacity in human. The limiting factor for progress in the area is access to funding and human subjects.Keywords
This publication has 73 references indexed in Scilit:
- Loss of Calcium in Human Spermatozoa via EPPIN, the Semenogelin Receptor1Biology of Reproduction, 2012
- Acrosome-reacted mouse spermatozoa recovered from the perivitelline space can fertilize other eggsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011
- Progesterone activates the principal Ca2+ channel of human spermNature, 2011
- Most fertilizing mouse spermatozoa begin their acrosome reaction before contact with the zona pellucida during in vitro fertilizationProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011
- Human ZP4 is not sufficient for taxon-specific sperm recognition of the zona pellucida in transgenic miceReproduction, 2011
- Inhibition of Ser/Thr Phosphatases Induces Capacitation-associated Signaling in the Presence of Src Kinase InhibitorsJournal of Biological Chemistry, 2010
- New insights into epididymal biology and functionHuman Reproduction Update, 2008
- Of mouse and man – what is the value of the mouse in predicting gene expression in humans?Drug Discovery Today, 2003
- The ‘Capacitation’ of the Mammalian SpermNature, 1952
- Fertilizing Capacity of Spermatozoa deposited into the Fallopian TubesNature, 1951