Ensuring high-quality patient care: the role of accreditation, licensure, specialty certification and revalidation in medicine
- 11 December 2013
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Medical Education
- Vol. 48 (1), 75-86
- https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12286
Abstract
The accreditation of medical school programmes and the licensing and revalidation (or recertification) of doctors are thought to be important for ensuring the quality of health care. Whereas regulation of the medical profession is mandated in most jurisdictions around the world, the processes by which doctors become licensed, and maintain their licences, are quite varied. With respect to educational programmes, there has been a recent push to expand accreditation activities. Here too, the quality standards on which medical schools are judged can vary from one region to another. Given the perceived importance placed by the public and other stakeholders on oversight in medicine, both at the medical school and individual practitioner levels, it is important to document and discuss the regulatory practices employed throughout the world. This paper describes current issues in regulation, provides a brief summary of research in the field, and discusses the need for further investigations to better quantify relationships among regulatory activities and improved patient outcomes. Although there is some evidence to support the value of medical school accreditation, the direct impact of this quality assurance initiative on patient care is not yet known. For both licensure and revalidation, some investigations have linked specific processes to quality indicators; however, additional evaluations should be conducted across the medical education and practice continuum to better elucidate the relationships among regulatory activities and patient outcomes. More importantly, the value of accreditation, licensure and revalidation programmes around the world, including the effectiveness of specific protocols employed in these diverse systems, needs to be better quantified and disseminated.Keywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Step 2 Clinical Skills Exam — A Poor Value PropositionThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2013
- Perceived value of Board certification and the Maintenance of Certification in Anesthesiology Program (MOCA®)Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, 2013
- Power of the policy: how the announcement of high-stakes clinical examination altered OSCE implementation at institutional levelBMC Medical Education, 2013
- Ensuring Physicians' Competence — Is Maintenance of Certification the Answer?The New England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Re-licensing of general practitioners using the current UK revalidation proposals: a cross sectional studyHeart, 2011
- Are United States Medical Licensing Exam Step 1 and 2 Scores Valid Measures for Postgraduate Medical Residency Selection Decisions?Academic Medicine, 2011
- Future of Board Certification in a New Era of Public AccountabilityThe Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 2010
- Accreditation Standards of Osteopathic and Allopathic Medical Schools: Could They Affect Educational Quality?Academic Medicine, 2009
- Protecting the Public: State Medical Board Licensure Policies for Active and Inactive PhysiciansPEDIATRICS, 2009
- A multimethod study of needs for physician assessment: Implications for education and regulationJournal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 2009