Sensitivity analysis and identification of the best evapotranspiration and runoff options for hydrological modelling in SWAT-2000
- 15 September 2006
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Hydrology
- Vol. 332 (3-4), 456-466
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.08.001
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment modelsJournal of Hydrology, 2005
- Which potential evapotranspiration input for a lumped rainfall–runoff model?Journal of Hydrology, 2004
- Comparison of two different approaches of sensitivity analysisPhysics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 2002
- Automatic calibration of a distributed catchment modelJournal of Hydrology, 2001
- SENSITIVITY CONSIDERATIONS WHEN MODELING HYDROLOGIC PROCESSES WITH DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL1Jawra Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2001
- Status of Automatic Calibration for Hydrologic Models: Comparison with Multilevel Expert CalibrationJournal of Hydrologic Engineering, 1999
- COMPARISON OF GREEN-AMPT AND CURVE NUMBER METHODS ON GOODWIN CREEK WATERSHED USING SWATTransactions of the ASAE, 1999
- Runoff Curve Number: Has It Reached Maturity?Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 1996
- A comprehensive surface-groundwater flow modelJournal of Hydrology, 1993
- Operational testing of hydrological simulation modelsHydrological Sciences Journal, 1986