Comparison of finite difference and finite element solutions to the variably saturated flow equation
- 10 January 2003
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Hydrology
- Vol. 270 (1-2), 49-64
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1694(02)00294-9
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Numerical modeling of water flow below dry salt lakes: effect of capillarity and viscosityJournal of Hydrology, 1999
- A physically based, two-dimensional, finite-difference algorithm for modeling variably saturated flowJournal of Hydrology, 1994
- A general mass‐conservative numerical solution for the unsaturated flow equationWater Resources Research, 1990
- Some new procedures for numerical solution of variably saturated flow problemsWater Resources Research, 1983
- A Comparative Study of Three Forms of the Richard Equation Used for Predicting One-Dimensional Infiltration in Unsaturated Soil1Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1981
- Study of the relative efficiency of finite difference and Galerkin techniques for modeling soil‐water transferWater Resources Research, 1978
- A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous mediaWater Resources Research, 1976
- Finite Element Analysis of Two-Dimensional Flow in Soils Considering Water Uptake by Roots: I. TheorySoil Science Society of America Journal, 1975
- Saturated-Unsaturated Seepage by Finite ElementsJournal of the Hydraulics Division, 1973
- On finite element integration in natural co-ordinatesInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1973