Assessment of Patient Empowerment - A Systematic Review of Measures
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 13 May 2015
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 10 (5), e0126553
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126553
Abstract
Patient empowerment has gained considerable importance but uncertainty remains about the best way to define and measure it. The validity of empirical findings depends on the quality of measures used. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of studies assessing psychometric properties of questionnaires purporting to capture patient empowerment, evaluate the methodological quality of these studies and assess the psychometric properties of measures identified. Electronic searches in five databases were combined with reference tracking of included articles. Peer-reviewed articles reporting psychometric testing of empowerment measures for adult patients in French, German, English, Portuguese and Spanish were included. Study characteristics, constructs operationalised and psychometric properties were extracted. The quality of study design, methods and reporting was assessed using the COSMIN checklist. The quality of psychometric properties was assessed using Terwee’s 2007 criteria. 30 studies on 19 measures were included. Six measures are generic, while 13 were developed for a specific condition (N=4) or specialty (N=9). Most studies tested measures in English (N=17) or Swedish (N=6). Sample sizes of included studies varied from N=35 to N=8261. A range of patient empowerment constructs was operationalised in included measures. These were classified into four domains: patient states, experiences and capacities; patient actions and behaviours; patient self-determination within the healthcare relationship and patient skills development. Quality assessment revealed several flaws in methodological study quality with COSMIN scores mainly fair or poor. The overall quality of psychometric properties of included measures was intermediate to positive. Certain psychometric properties were not tested for most measures. Findings provide a basis from which to develop consensus on a core set of patient empowerment constructs and for further work to develop a (set of) appropriately validated measure(s) to capture this. The methodological quality of psychometric studies could be improved by adhering to published quality criteria.Keywords
This publication has 66 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patient empowerment in long-term conditions: development and preliminary testing of a new measureBMC Health Services Research, 2013
- Patient empowerment: The need to consider it as a measurable patient-reported outcome for chronic conditionsBMC Health Services Research, 2012
- Patient empowerment—who empowers whom?The Lancet, 2012
- Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklistQuality of Life Research, 2011
- Development of a self-report measure of capability wellbeing for adults: the ICECAP-AQuality of Life Research, 2011
- Internal Consistency, Retest Reliability, and Their Implications for Personality Scale ValidityPersonality and Social Psychology Review, 2011
- The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi studyQuality of Life Research, 2010
- Evaluation of Item CandidatesMedical Care, 2007
- The effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a national lay-led self care support programme for patients with long-term conditions: a pragmatic randomised controlled trialJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2007
- Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): Conceptualizing and Measuring Activation in Patients and ConsumersHealth Services Research, 2004