Health-Related Quality of Life After Breast-Conserving Surgery and Intraoperative Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer Using Low-Kilovoltage X-rays
- 19 September 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Annals of Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 17 (S3), 359-367
- https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1257-z
Abstract
Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is currently being evaluated as a novel approach during breast-conserving surgery (BCS). IORT can be used either as a tumor bed boost followed by external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or as a single treatment. In a matched-pair study, we assessed quality of life (QoL) in 69 patients with early breast cancer treated with BCS and/or IORT and/or EBRT. Patients were matched for age and time since BCS. IORT was provided with 50 kV x-rays (Intrabeam) delivering 20 Gy at the applicator surface. EBRT (46 to 50 Gy in 2-Gy fractions in the IORT with EBRT group, and 56 Gy in 2-Gy fractions in the EBRT group) was initiated after completion of wound healing and/or chemotherapy. The mailed questionnaires included the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and BR23, FACT-F, HADS, Body Image Scale, and Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. At 18 to 70 months’ follow-up (median 47 months), all patients were disease free. We found only a few differences between the three groups. There was a trend toward more pain (mean ± standard deviation; 42.8 ± 32.9 vs. 27.5 ± 34.7) and reduced QoL (57.6 ± 20.7 vs. 70.3 ± 23.9) after IORT with EBRT compared with EBRT, respectively. IORT patients reported comparable QoL (70.3 ± 23.0), and less breast symptoms and body image concerns compared to EBRT (8.6 ± 12.3 vs. 19.2 ± 23.8, and 1.7 ± 3.3 vs. 3.4 ± 4.4, respectively). IORT alone resulted in significantly fewer breast symptoms (8.6 ± 12.3; P = 0.012) and less pain (23.9 ± 24.5, P = 0.041) compared with IORT with EBRT (26.1 ± 27.6; 42.8 ± 32.9, respectively). Patients with early breast cancer after BCS and IORT with or without EBRT present with comparable QoL like patients receiving EBRT without a boost. IORT patients show the lowest rate of breast symptoms.Keywords
This publication has 52 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quality of life over 5 years in women with breast cancer after breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy: a population-based studyZeitschrift für Krebsforschung und Klinische Onkologie, 2008
- Quality of Life Following Breast-Conserving Therapy or Mastectomy: Results of a 5-Year Prospective StudyThe Breast Journal, 2004
- Twenty-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Trial Comparing Total Mastectomy, Lumpectomy, and Lumpectomy plus Irradiation for the Treatment of Invasive Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Twenty-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Study Comparing Breast-Conserving Surgery with Radical Mastectomy for Early Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- The cosmetic outcome in early breast cancer treated with breast conservationEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology, 1999
- Treatment decision making and adjustment to breast cancer: A longitudinal study.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1998
- Psychosocial outcomes of breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy: A meta-analytic review.Health Psychology, 1997
- The influence of radiotherapy on cosmetic outcome after breast conservative surgeryInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1995
- Cosmetic and functional outcomes of breast conserving treatment for early stage breast cancer. 1. Comparison of patients' ratings, observers' ratings and objective assessmentsRadiotherapy and Oncology, 1992
- Breast conservationversus mastectomy. Is there a difference in psychological adjustment or quality of life in the year after surgery?Cancer, 1992