Bench-to-bedside review: The MET syndrome – the challenges of researching and adopting medical emergency teams
Open Access
- 1 January 2007
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Critical Care
- Vol. 12 (1), 205
- https://doi.org/10.1186/cc6199
Abstract
Studies of hospital performance highlight the problem of 'failure to rescue' in acutely ill patients. This is a deficiency strongly associated with serious adverse events, cardiac arrest, or death. Rapid response systems (RRSs) and their efferent arm, the medical emergency team (MET), provide early specialist critical care to patients affected by the 'MET syndrome': unequivocal physiological instability or significant hospital staff concern for patients in a non-critical care environment. This intervention aims to prevent serious adverse events, cardiac arrests, and unexpected deaths. Though clinically logical and relatively simple, its adoption poses major challenges. Furthermore, research about the effectiveness of RRS is difficult to conduct. Skeptics argue that inadequate evidence exists to support its widespread application. Indeed, supportive evidence is based on before-and-after studies, observational investigations, and inductive reasoning. However, implementing a complex intervention like RRS poses enormous logistic, political, cultural, and financial challenges. In addition, double-blinded randomised controlled trials of RRS are simply not possible. Instead, as in the case of cardiac arrest and trauma teams, change in practice may be slow and progressive, even in the absence of level I evidence. It appears likely that the accumulation of evidence from different settings and situations, though methodologically imperfect, will increase the rationale and logic of RRS. A conclusive randomised controlled trial is unlikely to occur.Keywords
This publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of the medical emergency team on long-term mortality following major surgeryCritical Care, 2007
- Rapid Response Teams—Walk, Don't RunJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2006
- Impact of patient monitoring on the diurnal pattern of medical emergency team activation*Critical Care Medicine, 2006
- A comparison of Antecedents to Cardiac Arrests, Deaths and EMergency Intensive care Admissions in Australia and New Zealand, and the United Kingdom—the ACADEMIA studyResuscitation, 2004
- Evaluation of a Medical Emergency Team one year after implementationResuscitation, 2004
- Physiological abnormalities in early warning scores are related to mortality in adult inpatients †British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2004
- Rates of in‐hospital arrests, deaths and intensive care admissions: the effect of a medical emergency teamThe Medical Journal of Australia, 2000
- Very early assessment of risk for in-hospital death among 11,483 patients with acute myocardial infarctionAmerican Heart Journal, 1999
- The Quality in Australian Health Care StudyThe Medical Journal of Australia, 1995
- The Nature of Adverse Events in Hospitalized PatientsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1991