Comparison of rumination activity measured using rumination collars against direct visual observations and analysis of video recordings of dairy cows in commercial farm environments
- 1 March 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Dairy Science Association in Journal of Dairy Science
- Vol. 98 (3), 1750-1758
- https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8565
Abstract
Automated systems for monitoring the behavior of cows have become increasingly important for management routines and for monitoring health and welfare. In the past few decades, various devices that record rumination have been developed. The aim of the present study was to compare rumination activity measured with a commercially available rumination collar (RC) against that obtained by direct visual observations and analysis of video recordings in commercial dairy cows. Rumination time from video recordings was recorded by a trained observer. To assess observer reliability, data were recorded twice, and the duration of recorded behaviors was very similar and highly correlated between these 2 measurements (mean=39±4 and 38±4 min/2 h). Measurements of rumination time obtained with RC when compared with analysis of video recordings and direct observations were variable: RC output was significantly positively related to observed rumination activity when dealing with animals housed indoors (trial 1 video recordings: slope=1.02, 95% CI=0.92-1.12), and the limits of agreement method (LoA) showed differences (in min per 2-h block) to be within -26.92 lower and 24.27 upper limits. Trial 1 direct observations: slope=1.08, 95% CI=0.62-1.55, and the LoA showed differences to be within -28.54 lower and 21.98 upper limits. Trial 2: slope=0.93, 95% CI=0.64-1.23, and the LoA showed differences to be within -32.56 lower and 19.84 upper limits. However, the results were poor when cows were outside grazing grass (trial 3: slope=0.57, 95% CI=0.13-1.02, and the LoA showed differences to be within wider limits -51.16 lower and 53.02 upper). Our results suggest that RC can determine rumination activity and are an alternative to visual observations when animals are housed indoors. However, they are not an alternative to direct observations with grazing animals on pasture and its use is not advisable until further research and validation are carried out.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Recording rumination time by a rumination monitoring system in Jersey heifers fed grass/clover silage and hay at three feeding levels12Journal of Animal Science, 2014
- Validating the accuracy of activity and rumination monitor data from dairy cows housed in a pasture-based automatic milking systemJournal of Dairy Science, 2013
- Technical Note: Validation of rumination collars for beef cattle1Journal of Animal Science, 2013
- Evaluation of eating and rumination behaviour in cows using a noseband pressure sensorBMC Veterinary Research, 2013
- Acoustic monitoring system to quantify ingestive behavior of free-grazing cattleComputers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2011
- Technical note: Evaluation of a system for monitoring rumination in heifers and calvesJournal of Dairy Science, 2011
- Effect of feeding cows in early lactation with diets differing in roughage-neutral detergent fiber content on intake behavior, rumination, and milk productionJournal of Dairy Science, 2009
- Agreement Between Methods of Measurement with Multiple Observations Per IndividualJournal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 2007
- An Automatic System for Quantification of Eating and Ruminating Activities of Dairy Cattle Housed in StallsJournal of Dairy Science, 1989
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986