Correlation-Adjusted Estimation of Sensitivity and Specificity of Two Diagnostic Tests
- 1 January 2003
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics
- Vol. 52 (1), 63-76
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9876.00389
Abstract
Summary: Models for multiple-test screening data generally require the assumption that the tests are independent conditional on disease state. This assumption may be unreasonable, especially when the biological basis of the tests is the same. We propose a model that allows for correlation between two diagnostic test results. Since models that incorporate test correlation involve more parameters than can be estimated with the available data, posterior inferences will depend more heavily on prior distributions, even with large sample sizes. If we have reasonably accurate information about one of the two screening tests (perhaps the standard currently used test) or the prevalences of the populations tested, accurate inferences about all the parameters, including the test correlation, are possible. We present a model for evaluating dependent diagnostic tests and analyse real and simulated data sets. Our analysis shows that, when the tests are correlated, a model that assumes conditional independence can perform very poorly. We recommend that, if the tests are only moderately accurate and measure the same biological responses, researchers use the dependence model for their analyses.This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hierarchical models for estimating herd prevalence and test accuracy in the absence of a gold standardJournal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, 2003
- Screening without a "Gold Standard": The Hui-Walter Paradigm RevisitedAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2001
- Field Evaluation of Sensitivity and Specificity of a Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) for Detection ofNucleospora salmonisin Rainbow TroutJournal of Aquatic Animal Health, 1998
- A Biomedical Application of Latent Class Models with Random EffectsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics, 1998
- A Model for Evaluating Sensitivity and Specificity for Correlated Diagnostic Tests in Efficacy Studies with an Imperfect Reference TestJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1998
- Comparing Accuracies of Two Screening Tests in a Two-Phase Study for DementiaJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics, 1998
- On Procedures for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Reinterview Survey Methods: Application to Labor Force DataJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1996
- Using EM to Obtain Asymptotic Variance-Covariance Matrices: The SEM AlgorithmJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1991
- Bayesian analysis of screening data: Application to AIDS in blood donorsThe Canadian Journal of Statistics / La Revue Canadienne de Statistique, 1991
- A comparison of three methods of feline leukaemia virus diagnosisVeterinary Record, 1982