Values associated with public involvement in health and social care research: a narrative review
Open Access
- 10 December 2013
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Health Expectations
- Vol. 18 (5), 661-675
- https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12158
Abstract
Background Much has been written about public involvement (PI) in health and social care research, but underpinning values are rarely made explicit despite the potential for these to have significant influence on the practice and assessment of PI. Objective The narrative review reported here is part of a larger MRC-funded study which is producing a framework and related guidance on assessing the impact of PI in health and social care research. The review aimed to identify and characterize the range of values associated with PI that are central elements of the framework. Methods We undertook a review and narrative synthesis of diverse literatures of PI in health and social care research, including twenty existing reviews and twenty-four chapters in sixteen textbooks. Results Three overarching value systems were identified, each containing five value clusters. (i) A system concerned with ethical and/or political issues including value clusters associated with empowerment; change/action; accountability/transparency; rights; and ethics (normative values). (ii). A system concerned with the consequences of public involvement in research including value clusters associated with effectiveness; quality/relevance; validity/reliability; representativeness/objectivity/generalizability; and evidence (substantive values). (iii) A system concerned with the conduct of public involvement in including value clusters associated with Partnership/equality; respect/trust; openness and honesty; independence; and clarity (process values). Conclusion Our review identified three systems associated with PI in health and social care research focused on normative, substantive and process values. The findings suggest that research teams should consider and make explicit the values they attach to PI in research and discuss ways in which potential tensions may be managed in order to maximize the benefits of PI for researchers, lay experts and the research.Keywords
Funding Information
- Medical Research Council's Methodology Research Programme (G0902155/93948)
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Eliciting ethical and social values in health technology assessment: A participatory approachSocial Science & Medicine, 2011
- Patients’ and clinicians’ research prioritiesHealth Expectations, 2010
- Dissemination of Results in Community-Based Participatory ResearchAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2010
- Children's participation in health research: from objects to agents?Child: Care, Health and Development, 2010
- Public involvement at the design stage of primary health research: A narrative review of case examplesHealth Policy, 2010
- Health researchers’ attitudes towards public involvement in health researchHealth Expectations, 2009
- Involving people affected by cancer in research: a review of literatureEuropean Journal of Cancer Care, 2008
- A multidimensional conceptual framework for analysing public involvement in health services researchHealth Expectations, 2008
- Methods of consumer involvement in developing healthcare policy and research, clinical practice guidelines and patient information materialCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2006
- Emerging from out of the shadows? Service user and carer involvement in systematic reviewsEvidence & Policy, 2005