Multi‐criteria decision support model for selecting the appropriate construction management at risk firm
- 1 April 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Construction Management and Economics
- Vol. 27 (4), 385-398
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190902759009
Abstract
Selecting the appropriate firm is of paramount importance especially when using a unique delivery method such as construction management at risk. In addition to general contracting services, the construction management at risk firm provides construction management services throughout the design and construction phases. A new decision support model is proposed to assist owners in the selection decision. Key selection factors were identified through a literature review. They are divided into four categories: firm characteristics; technical and commercial bid; construction management services; and general contracting services. Each consists of five selection factors. The selection criteria were determined using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) based on a questionnaire that was sent to construction professionals. The proposed model consists of five functions: strategic alignment; selection criteria; initial screening; firms' evaluations; and sensitivity analysis. The heart of the model is the use of the AHP to develop the decision criteria and compare candidate firms. A case study is also presented to demonstrate the application of the model.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Design–build pre-qualification and tendering approach for public projectsInternational Journal of Project Management, 2005
- Contractor selection using the analytic network processConstruction Management and Economics, 2004
- Project Delivery Systems and Project Change: Quantitative AnalysisJournal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2003
- Multi-criteria evaluation model for the selection of architectural consultantsConstruction Management and Economics, 2002
- Final contractor selection using the analytical hierarchy processConstruction Management and Economics, 2000
- Framework for Evaluating Bids of Construction ContractorsJournal of Management in Engineering, 1999
- Comparison of U.S. Project Delivery SystemsJournal of Construction Engineering and Management, 1998
- Prequalification and multi-criteria selection: a measure of contractors' opinionsConstruction Management and Economics, 1998
- Criteria for contractor selectionConstruction Management and Economics, 1997
- Contractor Prequalification in Saudi ArabiaJournal of Management in Engineering, 1996