Pregnancy options counseling
- 8 September 2022
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 34 (6), 386-390
- https://doi.org/10.1097/gco.0000000000000823
Abstract
Purpose of Review This article reviews key aspects of pregnancy options counseling, and highlights how inappropriate counseling can create barriers to timely and safe abortion care. Recent Findings Access to safe abortion services in the United States is increasingly constrained. One way to combat this hostile environment is to ensure that individuals presenting for care early in pregnancy have access to comprehensive and unbiased pregnancy options counseling. There are unfortunately many barriers to individuals receiving adequate pregnancy options counseling, and marginalized groups experience disproportionate effects of inappropriate counseling. Research shows that individuals desire appropriate pregnancy options counseling when seeking early pregnancy care, and that providers often serve as a barrier to this care. Provider miseducation and opposition to pregnancy options counseling, particularly as it concerns abortion care, creates challenges and delays for people seeking abortion services. Crisis Pregnancy Centers use misinformation to further these barriers to appropriate care. Summary Nondirective and patient-centered pregnancy options counseling is standard of care. People seeking pregnancy options counseling desire and deserve comprehensive and accurate information. Providers must not serve as barriers to safe and appropriate care. Increasing nondirective pregnancy options counseling research, education, and training is crucial to ensuring access to safe and appropriate abortion care.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Socioeconomic Outcomes of Women Who Receive and Women Who Are Denied Wanted Abortions in the United StatesAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2022
- Counseling and referrals for women with unplanned pregnancies at publicly funded family planning organizations in TexasContraception, 2019
- The Supreme Court’s Crisis Pregnancy Center Case — Implications for Health LawThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2018
- Family planning and contraception use in transgender menContraception, 2018
- What Women Want from Their Health Care Providers about Pregnancy Options Counseling: A Qualitative StudyWomen's Health Issues, 2017
- Diagnosis of Pregnancy and Providing Options Counseling for the Adolescent PatientPEDIATRICS, 2017
- “She's on her own”: a thematic analysis of clinicians' comments on abortion referralContraception, 2017
- Variation in Pregnancy Options Counseling and Referrals, And Reported Proximity to Abortion Services, Among Publicly Funded Family Planning FacilitiesPerspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2016
- Declines in Unintended Pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011The New England Journal of Medicine, 2016
- ACOG Committee Opinion No. 385: The Limits of Conscientious Refusal in Reproductive MedicineObstetrics & Gynecology, 2007