Policymakers’ and other stakeholders’ perceptions of key considerations for health system decisions and the presentation of evidence to inform those considerations: an international survey
Open Access
- 24 May 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Health Research Policy and Systems
- Vol. 11 (1), 19-9
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-11-19
Abstract
Background: The DECIDE framework was developed to support evidence-informed health system decisions through evidence summaries tailored to health policymakers. The objective of this study was to determine policymakers’ perceptions regarding the criteria in the DECIDE framework and how best to summarise and present evidence to support health system decisions. Methods: We conducted an online survey of a diverse group of stakeholders with health system decision experience from 15 countries and the World Health Organization. We asked about perceptions of criteria relevant to making health system decisions, use of evidence, grading systems, and evidence summaries. Results: We received 112 responses (70% response rate). Most respondents had healthcare (85%) and research (79%) experience. They (99%) indicated that systematic consideration of the available evidence would help to improve health system decision-making processes and supported the use of evidence from other countries (94%) and grading systems (81%). All ten criteria in the DECIDE framework were rated as important in the decision-making process. Respondents had divergent views regarding whether the same (38%) or different (45%) grading systems should be used across different types of health decisions. All components of our evidence summary were rated as important by over 90% of respondents. Conclusions: Survey respondents were supportive of the DECIDE framework for health system decisions and the use of succinct summaries of the estimated size of effects and the quality of evidence. It is uncertain whether the findings of this survey represent the views of policymakers with little or no healthcare and research experience.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing Summary of Findings tables—binary outcomesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2013
- Presenting the Results of Cochrane Systematic Reviews to a Consumer Audience: A Qualitative StudyMedical Decision Making, 2010
- User testing and stakeholder feedback contributed to the development of understandable and useful Summary of Findings tables for Cochrane reviewsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2010
- SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 13: Preparing and using policy briefs to support evidence-informed policymakingHealth Research Policy and Systems, 2009
- What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians?BMJ, 2008
- GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendationsBMJ, 2008
- Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 9. Grading evidence and recommendationsHealth Research Policy and Systems, 2006
- Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-makingJournal of Health Services Research & Policy, 2005
- Health policy-makers' perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic reviewJournal of Health Services Research & Policy, 2002
- Developing an evidence-based guide to community preventive services—methodsAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2000